To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • Applied Science, Technology and Administration
Faculty Name 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
John Azzaretto 0.0 N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0
David Dawson 0.0 N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0
Holly Ellis 0.0 N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0
Aneurin Grant 0.0 N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0
William Haraway III 0.0 N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0
Nancy Hastings 0.0 N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0
Byron Havard 0.0 N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sukumar Kamalasadan 0.0 N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0
Glenda Mayo 0.0 N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0
Preston Obray 0.0 N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0
Lakshmi Prayaga 0.0 N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0
Karen Rasmussen 0.0 N/A* 1.0 1.0 0.0
William Tankersley 0.0 N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0
Jill White 0.0 N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0
Department Total 0.0 N/A* 7.0 11.0 12.0

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2013 - 2014 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: Applied Science, Technology and Administration

  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      Building Construction, because of the diverse needs of the graduates, has specific areas of specialty discliplines. Although contractors are responsible for the means and methods of construction, they must also be aware of the engineering concepts, which include architectural design, structural and mechanical disciplines. This faculty line will not only assist with a much stronger structural component to the program, but will also assist with community and industry relationships through research in areas of structural engineering.

    • Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

      The Construction faculty have backgrounds in all the STEM content areas. The new full-time tenure seeking line would require someone with a doctorate in the construction area with an emphasis on soils, structures, and concrete mixtures, all of which include basic physics and mathematic formulations.

    • Accreditation Requirements

      In the AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION, DOCUMENT 103, has two specific areas which tie to our need for an additional faculty member.

      4.1.2 Each faculty member must have demonstrated expertise in the areas for which he/she has teaching responsibility and include adequate background in the supporting disciplines from which his area of specialty draws major concepts and principles.
      * Because our structure series is more engineering related, it is more of a design discipline with a specific area of expertise.

      Listed in Section 1 of Document 103 is the required curriculum topic content areas.
      Design Theory (Select one or more from the following
      options.)
      Structural Mechanics
      17 REV 3/12
      The changes to Section IX take effect July
      2014. Current Section IX is shown in black
      first, new Section IX is shown in red below.
      Electricity
      Thermodynamics
      Soil Mechanics
      Analysis and Design of Construction Systems (It is the intent of this requirement
      to ensure that construction program graduates have, at minimum, some exposure
      to all basic systems that may be incorporated into a building project.)
      Civil
      Electrical
      Mechanical
      Structural
      Building Codes and Standards
      Construction
      * In this case, our program has all areas specifically addressed; however, the structural and soils topics are covered by our one adjunct faculty. We are having difficulty with the faculty currently in his inability to work with students outside of class. This past year, our program paid to have a tutor come in to work with the students having difficulty in the first course of the series.

    • Niche programs with growth potential

      The Construction industry in Northwest Florida is expanding. The Construction Management program at UWF is one of the few programs available to Region 1 students. With the growth potential in both industry and education, the program aligns to secondary academy programs, community college, and technical center programs in the area. Many adult students are pursuing second careers; the programs offered in the Applied Science, Technology Administration Department fit nicely in to the educational preferences for adult learners. The program also includes efforts with continuing education to bring community members into the classroom for non-credit learning, exposing the community to the program and curriculum. The benefit also includes marketing efforts as more community members in the design and construction community know about the program.

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    The Construction program currently has two full-time faculty members. There are a number of possibilities to increase undergraduate enrollment as well as the opportunity to begin a masters program in Construction. The department will be seeking accreditation in the near future; therefore, a full-time, tenure earning position would help meet the requirements of the accrediting body,ACCE.

    The University is expanding both its face-to-face delivery and its online delivery of courses. The faculty position would expand the departments CORE research efforts as well as our outreach activities which include workforce development, professional and continuing education.

    Construction includes an engineering component, which current faculty has limited expertise. ACCE states,"The Constructor is to have a good understanding of the design disciplines (architecture and engineering) and the design processes to be effective in the construction industry. He/she must be able to communicate with design professionals and must also be able to use engineering principles to solve practical construction problems."

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

    The request is for a tenure earning; however, the Program is open to resolve current needs with any recommended position level.

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    "Teach construction- courses in undergraduate program and possibly in a new graduate program.
    "Conduct research in areas related to Departmental initiatives.
    "Research in areas related to our CORE Research efforts, which may include: Sustainability, and Storm Mitigation.
    "Participate in outreach activities, including Department initiatives:
    oCORE House, energy, mitigation, workforce development, and
    oProvide professional and continuing education.



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    An adjunct is currently covering the structures series courses. Due to his inability to teach more than one course, this series, which consists of three courses, can only begin for a student one time a year. If a student misses the sequence, he/she is delayed for graduation. A full-time faculty could teach two of the courses each semester, providing students more opportunities to enter the structures series courses.

    Additionally, we have raised funds to begin the CORE project, which includes a soils lab; however, there is lack of expertise in the structurs series equipment needs. A faculty who can "take the reins" for the soils lab and begin running courses with the required hands-on curriculum needs, would help in the areas of accreditation and for expanded areas of research for the CORE lab.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 +/-
    Lower
    924 804 684 804 720 ↓ 22.08%
    Upper
    2285 2410 2226 2637 2480 ↑  8.53%
    Graduate
    1030 1134 1143 2198 2467 ↑ 139.47%


    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 +/-
    Undergraduate
    07113E: INT INF TECH/E-LRNG  2   0   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    07113I: INT INF TECH/NET&TC  42   39   21   6   1  ↓ 98%
    07113K: INT INF TEC/N&T TEC  0   30   50   83   98  ↑ ∞
    08383O: CAREER&TECH/TCHR ED  7   6   5   1   0  ↓ ∞
    08383P: CAR&TECH/VOC PRG DEV  8   16   27   13   5  ↓ 38%
    08383Q: WORKFORCE/PRGM DEVEL  0   0   0   10   27  ↑ ∞
    08383T: CAREER&TECH/TECH ED  1   3   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    09843F: ENGINEERING TECH/CON  105   104   31   14   3  ↓ 97%
    09843G: ENGINEERING TECH/ELE  31   24   31   13   1  ↓ 97%
    09843I: ENGINEERING TECH/UND  3   2   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    09843K: ENG TECH/INFO ENGR  33   22   26   44   48  ↑ 45%
    09843L: ET/BUILD CONSTRUCT  0   0   61   71   85  ↑ ∞
    31053M: HLES/SPORT MANAGEMNT  68   99   104   121   139  ↑ 104%
    0984 E: ENGNRNG TECH/NON-DEG  13   1   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    0984 U: ENGR TECH/UG/NON-DEG  5   29   24   15   7  ↑ 40%
    TOTAL 318 375 380 391 414 ↑ 30%
    Graduate
    08135A: INSTRUCTIONAL TECH  33   31   21   20   24  ↓ 27%
    08275F: ED LDRSHP/ETMS  0   4   3   7   7  ↑ ∞
    08275N: ED LDRSHP/ETMS/HPT  3   5   1   7   8  ↑ 167%
    08275W: ED LDRSHP/ETMS/IT  6   3   8   5   6 
    =
    08298L: CUR&INS/INSTR TECH  43   80   72   72   56  ↑ 30%
    30995D: MSA/HUM PERF TECH  14   19   11   8   10  ↓ 29%
    30995E: MSA/PUB ADMIN  63   86   68   56   72  ↑ 14%
    30995F: MSA/ACQ&CON ADM  12   14   45   63   60  ↑ 400%
    30995L: MSA/LEADERSHIP  1   10   12   17   19  ↑ 1800%
    520G G: MSA/HPT/GRAD/ND  0   2   4   4   3  ↑ ∞
    TOTAL 175 254 245 259 265 ↑ 51%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 +/-
    Undergraduate
    07113I: INT INF TECH/NET&TC  4   14   13   4   2  ↓ 50%
    07113K: INT INF TEC/N&T TEC  0   0   5   15   16  ↑ ∞
    08383O: CAREER&TECH/TCHR ED  0   1   0   0   0 
    =
    08383P: CAR&TECH/VOC PRG DEV  3   1   9   4   5  ↑ 67%
    08383Q: WORKFORCE/PRGM DEVEL  0   0   0   2   4  ↑ ∞
    08383T: CAREER&TECH/TECH ED  0   1   0   0   0 
    =
    09843F: ENGINEERING TECH/CON  23   22   19   10   3  ↓ 87%
    09843G: ENGINEERING TECH/ELE  7   2   4   4   4  ↓ 43%
    09843K: ENG TECH/INFO ENGR  6   2   5   8   10  ↑ 67%
    09843L: ET/BUILD CONSTRUCT  0   0   7   3   14  ↑ ∞
    31053M: HLES/SPORT MANAGEMNT  18   12   16   20   33  ↑ 83%
    TOTAL 61 55 78 70 91 ↑ 49%
    Graduate
    08135A: INSTRUCTIONAL TECH  14   14   15   9   9  ↓ 36%
    08275F: ED LDRSHP/ETMS  0   1   0   3   4  ↑ ∞
    08275N: ED LDRSHP/ETMS/HPT  2   2   0   1   1  ↓ 50%
    08275W: ED LDRSHP/ETMS/IT  2   1   2   3   1  ↓ 50%
    08298L: CUR&INS/INSTR TECH  2   4   6   5   25  ↑ 1150%
    30995D: MSA/HUM PERF TECH  7   9   4   5   2  ↓ 71%
    30995E: MSA/PUB ADMIN  14   22   23   22   13  ↓  7%
    30995F: MSA/ACQ&CON ADM  4   3   11   17   28  ↑ 600%
    30995L: MSA/LEADERSHIP  0   0   4   3   7  ↑ ∞
    TOTAL 45 56 65 68 90 ↑ 100%


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

    08383O: CAREER&TECH/TCHR ED 0 0 1 0 0
    Program has been dropped

    08383P: CAR&TECH/VOC PRG DEV

    33%

    08383Q: WORKFORCE/PRGM DEVEL 0 0 0 0 2
    These two programs have been combined into Workforce and Program Development. Therefore, there is only one program offered in the content area.

    08383T: CAREER&TECH/TECH ED

    Program has been dropped

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    09843G: ENGINEERING TECH/ELE 4 7 2 4 4
    The above referenced program has been dropped as of the fall of 2012. All students have graduated from the program.

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 5.0 5.0 3.0 6.0 9.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 2.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 3.0

    Avg. student credit hours taught by
    full-time tenure earning and tenured faculty
    2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013
    206.83 187.70 N/A

    Data not yet available for this term


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      10/11 11/12 12/13
    Undergraduate 16 ( 42.1%) 20 ( 43.5%) 18 ( 46.2%)
    Graduate 20 ( 64.5%) 30 ( 56.6%) 22 ( 41.5%)


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 0.0 37.3 0.0 0.0 37.3 20.0 49.7 0.0 0.0 42.3 18.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 31.6
    Upper 17.6 22.4 0.0 0.0 19.2 21.1 10.9 0.0 0.0 17.7 21.3 21.0 0.0 16.0 20.8
    Graduate 14.7 12.3 0.0 22.0 14.7 13.7 13.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 15.6 16.8 0.0 13.0 15.9


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      10/11 11/12 12/13
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.6% 88.4% 0.0% 0.0% 15.8% 84.2% 0.0% 0.0%
    Upper 60.6% 39.3% 0.0% 0.1% 77.8% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0% 51.6% 46.2% 0.0% 2.1%
    Graduate 61.5% 24.1% 0.0% 14.4% 61.2% 38.6% 0.0% 0.2% 65.6% 32.7% 0.0% 1.7%
    Total 49.5% 46.8% 0.0% 3.7% 61.5% 38.4% 0.0% 0.1% 52.7% 45.6% 0.0% 1.7%