To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • Art
Faculty Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Thomas Asmuth N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Suzette Doyon N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Valerie George N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Stephen Haworth N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Joseph Herring N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
James Jipson N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Barbara Larson N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
John Markowitz N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Department Total N/A* 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2014 - 2015 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: Art

New line Request
  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      The discipline of Ceramics is a vital foundational component to the overall curriculum in the visual arts. The requirement that students be able to understand and apply principles of design in a three dimensional context is important for fine arts students who intend to further their education on the graduate level or pursue a career in teaching in the public schools. In addition, almost forty percent of the students in the Department of Art are now a part of the Graphic Design and BFA Digital Media programs respectively, and all need to have a solid working knowledge of three dimensional design. Graphic Design in particular has grown dramatically in part because of the new technologies that allow students to train for everything from traditional print based media, to motion graphics, and web design, to name just a few of the possibilities. Ceramics provides all our students with a broad based vocabulary that allows them to succeed in their chosen discipline. Establishing a permanent line in Ceramics will provide much needed stability in this area that has been sorely lacking.

    • Florida Board of Governors Areas of Strategic Emphasis      

      Not applicable

    • Accreditation Requirements

      The Department of Art is in the initial stages of preparing to apply for NASAD accreditation (National Association of Schools of Art and Design). With a student population of over 300 majors and forty minors, high quality programming in the three dimensional disciplines of Sculpture and Ceramics is a vital part of achieving this important distinction. A permanent line in Ceramics will be a key component in the department's successful application for accreditation.

    • Community/Visibility

      Ceramics is one of the oldest disciplines in the visual arts. It's been practiced by artisans and artists for thousands of years. Ceramics courses are among the first to fill every semester, and many non-majors take Ceramics as well. A permanent line in this area would allow for the kind of long term planning that would permit the department to greatly expand community engagement activities (workshops, presentations, exhibitions, etc.) for members of the community. Our current adjunct instructor is scheduled to conduct a day long workshop for the organization, The Pensacola Young Professionals, in June of this year. This is a group in Pensacola that regularly engages in community outreach and organizes cultural events and activities with the university and other arts organizations in the region. Many of their members are recent graduates of the University of West Florida. We will also have demonstrations in wheel throwing in the Ceramics studio for the upcoming Art and Aging event scheduled for May 21st of this year. This is an annual event in partnership with the Center on Aging here at UWF

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    A permanent Ceramic instructor will greatly enhance our department's ability to provide consistent,stable programming that is high in quality in a crucial area. Permanent instructors who develop a comprehensive curriculum in the various sub-disciplines is also a key element regarding recruitment, timely graduation rates, and retention.

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

    This is a request for a lecturer's line in Ceramics.

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    Teaching Assignment :(Four courses will be taught by the instructor each semester)

    • Beginning and Advanced Ceramics - BFA Studio Art Majors, BFA Digital Media Majors, BA Studio Art Majors, BA Art History Majors, BFA Graphic Design Majors, and Art Minors.
    Instructor will also regularly teach the following courses to the same student population:

    • Two Dimensional Design
    • Three Dimensional Design
    • Drawing I



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    In Ceramics, Mr. Quintin Owens is currently teaching these courses as an adjunct, and is doing a superb job. However, it is difficult to retain such quality instruction in this area under the current model as it relates to compensation. We have had three instructors in Ceramics in the last six years. Our last adjunct Ceramics instructor left for a tenure earning position and (understandably) Mr. Owens is seeking the same sort of career enhancement.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 +/-
    Undergraduate
    07113D: INT INF TECH/DIG MED  24   16   6   1   0  ↓ ∞
    10013B: ART HISTORY  34   32   27   23   21  ↓ 38%
    10013J: ART/ART EDUCATION  4   19   7   4   2  ↓ 50%
    10013S: ART/STUDIO ART  100   89   92   90   70  ↓ 30%
    10013T: ART/GRAPHIC DESIGN  62   114   128   140   141  ↑ 127%
    10023C: BFA/DIGITAL/PENDING  8   10   14   19   19  ↑ 138%
    10023F: FINE ARTS  6   17   28   26   15  ↑ 150%
    10023J: BFA/DIGITAL ART  3   3   2   4   7  ↑ 133%
    10023P: FINE ARTS/PENDING  21   14   18   18   19  ↓  10%
    1001: ART/NON-DEGREE  1   1   1   1   1 
    =
    1001 U: ART/UG/NON-DEGREE  5   3   8   10   7  ↑ 40%
    TOTAL 268 318 331 336 302 ↑ 13%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Undergraduate
    07113D: INT INF TECH/DIG MED  3   7   5   1   0  ↓ ∞
    10013B: ART HISTORY  5   10   5   7   6  ↑ 20%
    10013J: ART/ART EDUCATION  0   0   3   2   1  ↑ ∞
    10013S: ART/STUDIO ART  26   15   25   22   23  ↓ 12%
    10013T: ART/GRAPHIC DESIGN  2   16   21   37   27  ↑ 1250%
    10023F: FINE ARTS  6   6   6   8   11  ↑ 83%
    10023J: BFA/DIGITAL ART  1   0   2   2   0  ↓ ∞
    TOTAL 43 54 67 79 68 ↑ 58%


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

    1.ART EDUCATION SPECIALIZATION (100013J) HAS BEEN DELETED .
    2.INT INF TECH/ DIGWILL BE DELETED.

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    Not applicable

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Lower
    4176 4437 4260 4551 3846 ↓  7.90%
    Upper
    3122 3608 4041 3947 3286 ↑  5.25%
    Graduate
    9 9 15 15 6 ↓ 33.33%
    Total
    7307 8054 8316 8513 7138 ↓  2.31%
    Weighted Total
    7937 8781 9133 9311 7799 ↓  1.74%


    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0


    Departmental Growth Capacity
      2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
    Weighted SCH/FTE 1305 1331 1115
    Growth Capacity Rank 2 (of 11) 1 (of 11) 2 (of 11)
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2011/2012
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 9024 4.0 2256 1
    Biology 16733 10.5 1594 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 19067 14.0 1362 1
    Art 9133 7.0 1305 2
    Computer Science 12818 11.0 1166 2
    Anthropology 8127 7.0 1162 2
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17036 15.3 1114 3
    History 8724 8.0 1091 3
    Psychology 16253 15.0 1084 3
    English and World Languages 17307 16.0 1082 4
    Philosophy 6006 6.0 1001 4
    Criminal Justice 6951 7.0 993 4
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 4952 5.0 991 5
    Finance 3858 4.0 965 5
    Legal Studies 2771 3.0 924 5
    Communication Arts 12916 14.0 923 6
    Marketing 6387 7.0 913 6
    Environmental Studies 6273 7.0 897 6
    Management 9366 11.0 852 7
    Physics 3371 4.0 843 7
    Chemistry 6730 8.0 842 7
    Research and Advanced Studies 5818 7.0 832 8
    Economics 3291 4.0 823 8
    Social Work 7981 10.0 799 8
    Accounting 7560 10.0 757 9
    Government 3606 5.0 722 9
    Theatre 3523 5.0 705 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7485 11.0 681 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18823 29.0 650 10
    Music 4414 7.0 631 10
    Nursing 4903 9.0 545 11
    Management Information Systems 1461 3.0 487 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1350 3.0 450 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2012/2013
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 11819 6.0 1970 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 22668 15.0 1512 1
    Art 9311 7.0 1331 1
    Biology 17727 13.5 1314 2
    Philosophy 6383 5.0 1277 2
    Economics 3502 3.0 1168 2
    Anthropology 8391 8.0 1049 3
    English and World Languages 17654 17.0 1039 3
    Criminal Justice 7000 7.0 1000 3
    Finance 3958 4.0 990 4
    Computer Science 12644 13.0 973 4
    Psychology 15498 16.0 969 4
    Environmental Studies 6673 7.0 954 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 18081 19.3 937 5
    Communication Arts 12971 14.0 927 5
    History 8177 9.0 909 6
    Physics 3504 4.0 876 6
    Government 4232 5.0 847 6
    Chemistry 7148 9.0 795 7
    Management 9426 12.0 786 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6086 8.0 761 7
    Social Work 7415 10.0 742 8
    Nursing 6563 9.0 730 8
    Music 4716 7.0 674 8
    Legal Studies 2678 4.0 670 9
    Marketing 5813 9.0 646 9
    Research and Advanced Studies 3840 6.0 640 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7642 12.0 637 10
    Theatre 3080 5.0 616 10
    Accounting 7867 13.0 606 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18371 32.0 575 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1187 3.0 396 11
    Management Information Systems 1171 3.0 391 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2013/2014
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 14612 6.0 2436 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 20268 13.0 1560 1
    Economics 3915 3.0 1305 1
    Legal Studies 2492 2.0 1246 2
    Biology 16742 13.5 1241 2
    Art 7799 7.0 1115 2
    Philosophy 5327 5.0 1066 3
    Computer Science 13429 13.0 1033 3
    Finance 3897 4.0 975 3
    English and World Languages 16479 17.0 970 4
    Psychology 15464 16.0 967 4
    Anthropology 7458 8.0 933 4
    Environmental Studies 6500 7.0 929 5
    Management 10801 12.0 901 5
    Criminal Justice 7146 8.0 894 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17666 20.0 884 6
    Communication Arts 12284 14.0 878 6
    History 7630 9.0 848 6
    Physics 3306 4.0 827 7
    Chemistry 7333 9.0 815 7
    Marketing 5653 7.0 808 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6419 8.0 803 8
    Government 4383 6.0 731 8
    Social Work 7703 11.0 701 8
    Accounting 7334 11.0 667 9
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 17988 30.0 600 9
    Music 4177 7.0 597 9
    Nursing 6823 11.8 581 10
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 6941 12.0 579 10
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1127 2.0 564 10
    Research and Advanced Studies 3342 6.0 558 11
    Theatre 2711 5.0 543 11
    Management Information Systems 1104 3.0 368 11


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 81.5 26.3 0.0 0.0 30.9 36.5 27.1 0.0 0.0 29.2 41.6 22.5 0.0 0.0 26.0
    Upper 20.5 17.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 22.3 14.3 0.0 0.0 17.8 17.4 16.4 0.0 0.0 16.9
    Graduate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 26.0% 74.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5% 74.5% 0.0% 0.0% 29.0% 71.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Upper 56.0% 44.0% 0.0% 0.0% 56.1% 43.9% 0.0% 0.0% 52.4% 47.6% 0.0% 0.0%
    Graduate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Total 39.6% 60.4% 0.0% 0.0% 38.7% 61.3% 0.0% 0.0% 38.8% 61.2% 0.0% 0.0%


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Undergraduate 48 ( 43.6%) 58 ( 49.6%) 62 ( 57.9%)
    Graduate 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%)