To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • English and World Languages
Faculty Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Laura Arguea N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
David Baulch N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Patrick Belk N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Robin Blyn N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Angela Calcaterra N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
David Earle N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Jonathan Fink N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Raina Garret N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Mamie Hixon N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Mark James N/A* 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
F Allen Josephs N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Rose Lessy N/A* 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Pamela Meyers N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Linda Moore N/A* 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Katherine Romack N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Regina Sakalarios-Rogers N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Christopher Satterwhite N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Judith Steele N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Gregory Tomso N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Maria Warren N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Robert Yeager N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Judy Young N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Department Total N/A* 16.0 16.0 17.0 17.0

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2014 - 2015 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: English and World Languages

Replacement Line Request
  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      This faculty line search request accommodates a replacement line. We are losing a long-term Composition Instructor, Maria Warren, due to retirement. The Department of English and World Languages requests an instructor position to replace Warren's teaching load and departmental service obligations. In losing Warren, the department will lose the sole faculty member who teaches Technical Writing courses; as a result, we were not able to offer any fall sections of ENC 3240 Technical Writing. This course is a requirement for some majors.

      We request, through this position line, a faculty hire in the field of Composition who will be able to assist with the reform of General Education Composition courses and carry forward in-process initiatives that directly impact student learning and first-to-second year student retention. General Education impacts the entire university, and our efforts to build a stronger quality writing program not only targets student learning at the university but also reaches students' professional workforce production. Composition is a subject area that has high impact across all disciplines; therefore, this new faculty line benefits the entire university culture - not only the Department of English and World Languages.

      While we seek and need a PhD level candidate, as an instructor line hire, we realize we will receive MA level candidates as well. In the field of Composition, it will be difficult to hire a PhD at the rank of Instructor. However, an additional instructor line would be greatly appreciated due to the overwhelming number of contingent faculty members in the Composition Program. The current primary workforce in the Composition Program is adjunct faculty with MA degree levels in Literature areas of speciality. The training of a literature emphasis significantly differs from the writing theory and pedagogy focus that a Composition and Rhetoric specialist receives. We need a person who is trained in the best practices of the field of Composition and Rhetoric so we can continue improving writing instruction in General Studies and across campus.

    • Florida Board of Governors Areas of Strategic Emphasis      

      UWF has a real need and demand for additional writing instruction for students as they navigate across their four-year experience. Writing instruction for students solely situated at their first year of college is only a starting point for what students need in terms of written communication preparation for college and for the workforce. The new hire that we request will explicitly contribute to UWF's Strategic Plan, impacting in particular Strategic Directions 1) "Enhanced Student Access, Learning, Progression, and Development, 2) Distinctive Teaching, Scholarship, Research, and Professional Contributions , and 4) Sustainable Institutional Excellence.

      The most recently articulated Quality Enhancement Plan agenda set for UWF’s 2015 SACSCOC reaffirmation is devoted to the topic "Communication for Professional Success: Using high-impact practices to improve students’ written and oral communication." As stated from the Office of the Provost, the aim of this QEP initiative is to help improve students' "verbal and written communication skills and thus their professional preparation for employment, advanced education, and/or public service." The teaching of Technical and Professional Writing courses, ENC 3240 and 3250, are integral to the training of students for a 21st century workforce. The department has a newly designed course, ENC 2990 Digital Writing, that also prepares students for writing in the workplace and in public genres beyond the academy. An instructor hire with a teaching speciality in Composition would be able to teach and assess these courses, helping the department salvage and sustain this important curricula.

      UWF has significant structural work to complete before the university's 2015 QEP critical goal can be met. Currently, the only specific Composition courses students take are during the first year of academic instruction, a requirement completed through ENC 1101 and 1102. We need additional ENC courses, which inevitably requires the presence of additional qualified and more permanent-standing faculty.

    • Accreditation Requirements

      Currently, over 90% of General Studies Composition courses are taught by contingent faculty members, adjuncts and/or graduate teaching assistants. The Department of English and World Languages and UWF only have one tenure-track faculty member with a PhD speciality in Composition and Rhetoric. Comparable universities at the national and regional level have more than one tenure-track Composition specialist. The fact that all Composition programmatic work falls on one faculty member strongly hinders UWF's ability to progress with distinctive teaching in composition and limits students' access to and learning of the most up-to-date high impact writing and communication practices.

      The SACSCOC Commission Guidelines on Faculty Credentials states that faculty teaching general education courses at the undergraduate level must hold a doctorate or master’s degree in the "teaching discipline or master’s degree with a concentration in the teaching discipline (a minimum of 18 graduate semester hours in the teaching discipline)". With the retirement of Warren, only one Composition faculty member meets this accreditation standard and holds the degree in the "teaching discipline" of Composition and Rhetoric, which leaves over 96% of General Studies Composition faculty as holding master degree's in English with a Literature or Creative Writing teaching discipline emphasis - a degree training and practice quite different from the teaching of Composition, Technical and Professional Writing, Digital Writing, and other areas of writing instruction across the disciplines other than the humanities.

    • Community/Visibility

      When the current Director of Composition arrived to UWF in fall semester 2012, only a few undergraduate, ENC designated courses existed on the course registration: the two first-year Composition courses (ENC 1101 and 1102), Technical Writing (ENC 3240), and Professional Writing (ENC 3250). The latter two courses are solely taught as online sections and are required by select majors.

      In order to meet the goal of "reforming writing culture," a stated charge announced at the Annual College of Arts and Sciences Fall 2012 faculty and staff meeting, the Composition Director prioritized the design of new ENC courses. Such a programmatic move would, for one, increase visibility of writing intensive instruction across campus, and secondly, such a move would enhance the overall writing culture by offering students a more sustained and reiterative experience with learning writing and communication. Over the past four semesters, ENC courses have definitely increased in visibility, but we now face the challenge of who will teach these new courses. We are at a standstill for designing or revising any additional courses due to a lack of highly qualified faculty. In addition to enhancing students' access to distinctive teaching in General Studies Composition courses, with a new instructor line hire, we hope to revamp Technical and Professional Writing as revised, face-to-face offered courses in addition to online sections.

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    Over the last two years, the Composition and Rhetoric Program has worked to increase evidence of a quality writing program through the implementation of continuous assessment improvement, new course design, and ongoing professional development for current Composition faculty members. The Composition Committee has revised and is revising the course outcomes for both first-year Composition courses and has designed a more standard curriculum for ENC 1102 College Composition II with the plan to implement a similar plan for ENC 1101 this fall 2013 semester. The latter programmatic changes are in direct response to university and state-level concerns about students receiving a more consistent experience in General Education courses across the SUS in Florida.

    Written communication skills mark a significant pressure point at all higher learning institutions. UWF currently serves over 2000 students in the First-Year Composition curriculum. As stated above, the Director of Composition, across the past three semesters, has created three additional ENC courses, currently operating under the experimental 990 model. As these new courses become official CCR listed classes, the Composition Program remains in dire need of additional permanent faculty members who will be able to assist in the teaching and assessment of these writing courses. Before we are able to create any additional courses or make subsequent revisions to the writing curriculum at UWF, necessitated by Board of Governors and QEP initiatives, we must have an additional hire with the degree specialty in the teaching discipline of Composition and Rhetoric.

    The Composition Program consists of, on average, 25+ contingent faculty members who require on-going professional development and training in the teaching and assessment of writing. A replacement instructor faculty line would enable the workload of this critical faculty training to be shared among the one tenure-track faculty member and two remaining instructors. In addition, the Composition Program and the Department of English and World Languages just approved a revised TA Training Program that includes an extensive mentoring and practicum program for graduate teaching assistants who seek to teach their own sections of ENC 1101 and 1102. At the practicum stage, graduate TAs work in an experienced teacher's ENC 1101 or 1102 classroom for a semester. We aim to place graduate students with the most experienced and highest quality teacher mentors. Currently, we rely on three faculty members to assist in this important graduate student training.

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    The newly appointed instructor will hold a degree in the discipline of Composition and Rhetoric. Workload assignment will include teaching General Studies writing courses, teaching Technical and Professional Writing courses, teaching the following newly designed courses: Introduction to STEM Writing, Writing Studio, and Digital Writing. In addition to teaching responsibilities, the new hire will assist with curricular development and revision and with on-going assessment initiatives by serving as a member of the Composition Committee.



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    Currently, General Studies Composition instruction is taught predominantly by adjunct faculty. The Composition Program currently has one tenure-track, PhD faculty member and a small number of full-time instructors who teach in the General Studies Composition curriculum. We are losing one long-term, full-time instructor at the end of this academic year due to her retirement.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 +/-
    Undergraduate
    15013C: ENGLISH/LIBERAL ARTS  97   77   75   65   82  ↓ 15%
    15013W: ENGLISH/WRITING  87   101   109   123   102  ↑ 17%
    1501: EH/NON-DEGREE  1   1   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    1501 U: EH/UG/NON-DEGREE  46   36   34   31   26  ↓ 43%
    TOTAL 231 215 218 219 210 ↓  9%
    Graduate
    15015B: ENGLISH/CREATIVE WRI  19   20   17   11   6  ↓ 68%
    15015C: ENGLISH/LITERATURE  24   26   22   21   22  ↓  8%
    1501 G: EH/GRAD/NON-DEGREE  0   4   5   2   1  ↑ ∞
    TOTAL 43 50 44 34 29 ↓ 33%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Undergraduate
    15013C: ENGLISH/LIBERAL ARTS  31   23   19   16   21  ↓ 32%
    15013W: ENGLISH/WRITING  18   18   28   19   29  ↑ 61%
    TOTAL 49 41 47 35 50 ↑  2%
    Graduate
    15015B: ENGLISH/CREATIVE WRI  4   8   6   4   5  ↑ 25%
    15015C: ENGLISH/LITERATURE  3   1   8   8   5  ↑ 67%
    TOTAL 7 9 14 12 10 ↑ 43%


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Lower
    11512 11584 12400 13183 12342 ↑  7.21%
    Upper
    3802 3603 3545 3266 3062 ↓ 19.46%
    Graduate
    466 485 408 345 289 ↓ 37.98%
    Total
    15780 15672 16353 16794 15693 ↓  0.55%
    Weighted Total
    16820 16684 17307 17654 16479 ↓  2.03%


    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 10.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 7.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0


    Departmental Growth Capacity
      2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
    Weighted SCH/FTE 1082 1039 970
    Growth Capacity Rank 4 (of 11) 3 (of 11) 4 (of 11)
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2011/2012
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 9024 4.0 2256 1
    Biology 16733 10.5 1594 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 19067 14.0 1362 1
    Art 9133 7.0 1305 2
    Computer Science 12818 11.0 1166 2
    Anthropology 8127 7.0 1162 2
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17036 15.3 1114 3
    History 8724 8.0 1091 3
    Psychology 16253 15.0 1084 3
    English and World Languages 17307 16.0 1082 4
    Philosophy 6006 6.0 1001 4
    Criminal Justice 6951 7.0 993 4
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 4952 5.0 991 5
    Finance 3858 4.0 965 5
    Legal Studies 2771 3.0 924 5
    Communication Arts 12916 14.0 923 6
    Marketing 6387 7.0 913 6
    Environmental Studies 6273 7.0 897 6
    Management 9366 11.0 852 7
    Physics 3371 4.0 843 7
    Chemistry 6730 8.0 842 7
    Research and Advanced Studies 5818 7.0 832 8
    Economics 3291 4.0 823 8
    Social Work 7981 10.0 799 8
    Accounting 7560 10.0 757 9
    Government 3606 5.0 722 9
    Theatre 3523 5.0 705 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7485 11.0 681 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18823 29.0 650 10
    Music 4414 7.0 631 10
    Nursing 4903 9.0 545 11
    Management Information Systems 1461 3.0 487 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1350 3.0 450 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2012/2013
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 11819 6.0 1970 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 22668 15.0 1512 1
    Art 9311 7.0 1331 1
    Biology 17727 13.5 1314 2
    Philosophy 6383 5.0 1277 2
    Economics 3502 3.0 1168 2
    Anthropology 8391 8.0 1049 3
    English and World Languages 17654 17.0 1039 3
    Criminal Justice 7000 7.0 1000 3
    Finance 3958 4.0 990 4
    Computer Science 12644 13.0 973 4
    Psychology 15498 16.0 969 4
    Environmental Studies 6673 7.0 954 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 18081 19.3 937 5
    Communication Arts 12971 14.0 927 5
    History 8177 9.0 909 6
    Physics 3504 4.0 876 6
    Government 4232 5.0 847 6
    Chemistry 7148 9.0 795 7
    Management 9426 12.0 786 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6086 8.0 761 7
    Social Work 7415 10.0 742 8
    Nursing 6563 9.0 730 8
    Music 4716 7.0 674 8
    Legal Studies 2678 4.0 670 9
    Marketing 5813 9.0 646 9
    Research and Advanced Studies 3840 6.0 640 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7642 12.0 637 10
    Theatre 3080 5.0 616 10
    Accounting 7867 13.0 606 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18371 32.0 575 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1187 3.0 396 11
    Management Information Systems 1171 3.0 391 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2013/2014
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 14612 6.0 2436 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 20268 13.0 1560 1
    Economics 3915 3.0 1305 1
    Legal Studies 2492 2.0 1246 2
    Biology 16742 13.5 1241 2
    Art 7799 7.0 1115 2
    Philosophy 5327 5.0 1066 3
    Computer Science 13429 13.0 1033 3
    Finance 3897 4.0 975 3
    English and World Languages 16479 17.0 970 4
    Psychology 15464 16.0 967 4
    Anthropology 7458 8.0 933 4
    Environmental Studies 6500 7.0 929 5
    Management 10801 12.0 901 5
    Criminal Justice 7146 8.0 894 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17666 20.0 884 6
    Communication Arts 12284 14.0 878 6
    History 7630 9.0 848 6
    Physics 3306 4.0 827 7
    Chemistry 7333 9.0 815 7
    Marketing 5653 7.0 808 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6419 8.0 803 8
    Government 4383 6.0 731 8
    Social Work 7703 11.0 701 8
    Accounting 7334 11.0 667 9
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 17988 30.0 600 9
    Music 4177 7.0 597 9
    Nursing 6823 11.8 581 10
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 6941 12.0 579 10
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1127 2.0 564 10
    Research and Advanced Studies 3342 6.0 558 11
    Theatre 2711 5.0 543 11
    Management Information Systems 1104 3.0 368 11


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 22.5 27.4 25.3 0.0 25.9 23.9 25.9 24.6 0.0 25.3 22.2 25.0 25.2 0.0 24.6
    Upper 21.6 18.0 0.0 0.0 21.3 19.9 20.0 0.0 0.0 19.9 21.8 7.0 0.0 0.0 20.5
    Graduate 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 9.5 3.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 16.0% 59.1% 24.9% 0.0% 16.7% 65.3% 17.9% 0.0% 12.9% 79.6% 7.5% 0.0%
    Upper 94.8% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 98.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Graduate 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.4% 3.6% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Total 34.4% 46.5% 19.1% 0.0% 33.3% 52.5% 14.2% 0.0% 30.6% 63.5% 6.0% 0.0%


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Undergraduate 40 ( 18.5%) 44 ( 19.4%) 32 ( 15.1%)
    Graduate 9 ( 90.0%) 8 ( 88.9%) 7 (100.0%)