To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • English and World Languages
Faculty Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Laura Arguea N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
David Baulch N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Patrick Belk N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Robin Blyn N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Angela Calcaterra N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
David Earle N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Jonathan Fink N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Raina Garret N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Mamie Hixon N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Mark James N/A* 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
F Allen Josephs N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Rose Lessy N/A* 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Pamela Meyers N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Linda Moore N/A* 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Katherine Romack N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Regina Sakalarios-Rogers N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Christopher Satterwhite N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Judith Steele N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Gregory Tomso N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Maria Warren N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Robert Yeager N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Judy Young N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Department Total N/A* 16.0 16.0 17.0 17.0

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2014 - 2015 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: English and World Languages

New Line Request
  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      EWL requests 3-year terminal line, with possibility of renewal and/or upgrade to tenure line, for a Ph.D./AB.D in Spanish (preferred), French, or German (possible, in that order), with specialty in the pedagogy of language (not literature) instruction and delivery, and with experience (instructional and/or administrative) in translation/interpretation studies (T/IS), to fill a new position instituted in the current restructure. Primary responsibilities are 1) to weld the present disparate languages into a coherent, single unit capable of developing instruction in languages other than English into training programs targeting workforce needs in the expanding global economy; 2) to establish and develop a viable translation/interpretation studies (T/IS)component capable of placing UWF graduates in jobs in the public and private sectors upon graduation.

    • Florida Board of Governors Areas of Strategic Emphasis      

      Languages and T/IS especially respond directly to two of the BOG's Areas of Strategic Emphasis: "Critical Workforce--Education" and "Economic Development--Global Competitiveness." Regionally, Spanish, French (Louisiana businesses and industries), and German (looking ahead to the German-led and German-supplied Airbus plant outside of Mobile) have strong potential for clear and emphatic impact. Moreover, with the addition of on-campus instruction in Chinese through the Confucius Institute, this position as Co-ordinator of Languages will provide outreach into the fastest-growing economic region on the planet.

    • Accreditation Requirements

      Currently despite regular and ongoing instruction in French, German, Spanish, Japanese, Arabic, with intermittent instruction in Chinese and Portuguese, THERE IS NO Ph.D. involved PRIMARILY with instruction in ANY language at UWF. (Two are partially so employed: Allen Josephs, who teaches one section of Spanish 1, and the new Director of the Japan Center, whose duties are primarily administrative and community-oriented.) All remaining language instruction, in multiple sections, is taught by holders of the M.A. degree; all but one--Laura Arguea, an Instructor/Lecturer--as adjuncts. The entire program at UWF suffers from want of a trained professional, up-to-date with pedagogical best practices in language instruction. No one currently is able to plan/administer a T/IS program, although this is perhaps the most likely to have broad workforce and local/global competitiveness impact.

    • Community/Visibility

      The presence of UWF graduates with polished language skills in high-visibility jobs such as nursing, manufacturing, the justice and court systems, international communication (print, video and internet)will only have a significant and highly visible impact in a state and an area of multilingual population, with a governor's office actively recruiting business connections in Europe and in Latin America. (To quote Rick Harper, in private conversation: "Don Gaetz sure wished he could speak German!") In addition--a T/IS program at UWF would attract students--and hence attention--from across the region and the nation,since there are only two such functioning programs in the Southeast.

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    Many of these are covered in sections above. In terms of quality: it is worth emphasizing that the immanent SACSCOC review will undoubtedly find cause to comment on the present disarray of languages, with decentralized administrations, multiple-unit reporting, dearth of trained, doctoral-equipped instructoral staff. In terms of online courses: clearly, one of the longer-term goals of the T/IS program (and languages generally) is to develop online capacity. This has been tested and proven workable with the Arabic program offered through the collaboration of Continuing Education and the Department of EWL. Ideally the person hired would expand this capacity in additional ways.

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

    This request is for a three-year, terminal position with the POSSIBILITY of renewal at either the 3-year terminal or conversion to tenure-earning position. Success in the task(s) outlined above will be the determining factor. (N.B.: maintaining the POSSIBILITY of tenure-earning conversion will be critical in attracting top-notch candidates for what must be described as a large and demanding assignment.)

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    The Co-Ordinator of Languages (COL--a working title)will be responsible for 1) establishing a coherent, unified home for all languages and language-related instruction (e.g., T/IS) at UWF, including course planning, hiring, scheduling, and supervision of instructional staff; 2) developing and implementing a program in T/IS beginning with Spanish but with expectations /structures for growth; 3) teaching a maximum of two courses per semester (possibly a 2 + 1, depending on delineation of administrative responsibilities, to be determined later)in the language of expertise (Spanish, French, or Germa; EXPECTED: NEW COURSES IN T/IS); 4) taking part in the normal workload of committees, etc. expected of a UWF faculty member. The COL will report directly to the Chair of the Department of EWL, until such time as the languages can stand alone.



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    The position of COL does not exist currently; hence, it is not covered. Clearly those language classes in whatever language taught by the COL will replace language classes currently taught by adjuncts, with the exception of new courses in T/IS, as this program is initiated and developed.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 +/-
    Undergraduate
    15013C: ENGLISH/LIBERAL ARTS  97   77   75   65   82  ↓ 15%
    15013W: ENGLISH/WRITING  87   101   109   123   102  ↑ 17%
    1501: EH/NON-DEGREE  1   1   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    1501 U: EH/UG/NON-DEGREE  46   36   34   31   26  ↓ 43%
    TOTAL 231 215 218 219 210 ↓  9%
    Graduate
    15015B: ENGLISH/CREATIVE WRI  19   20   17   11   6  ↓ 68%
    15015C: ENGLISH/LITERATURE  24   26   22   21   22  ↓  8%
    1501 G: EH/GRAD/NON-DEGREE  0   4   5   2   1  ↑ ∞
    TOTAL 43 50 44 34 29 ↓ 33%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Undergraduate
    15013C: ENGLISH/LIBERAL ARTS  31   23   19   16   21  ↓ 32%
    15013W: ENGLISH/WRITING  18   18   28   19   29  ↑ 61%
    TOTAL 49 41 47 35 50 ↑  2%
    Graduate
    15015B: ENGLISH/CREATIVE WRI  4   8   6   4   5  ↑ 25%
    15015C: ENGLISH/LITERATURE  3   1   8   8   5  ↑ 67%
    TOTAL 7 9 14 12 10 ↑ 43%


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

    Does not apply in relation to the requested COL position.

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    There is no graduate degree specialization in any language, nor is there any requested or projected.

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Lower
    11512 11584 12400 13183 12342 ↑  7.21%
    Upper
    3802 3603 3545 3266 3062 ↓ 19.46%
    Graduate
    466 485 408 345 289 ↓ 37.98%
    Total
    15780 15672 16353 16794 15693 ↓  0.55%
    Weighted Total
    16820 16684 17307 17654 16479 ↓  2.03%


    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 10.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 7.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0


    Departmental Growth Capacity
      2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
    Weighted SCH/FTE 1082 1039 970
    Growth Capacity Rank 4 (of 11) 3 (of 11) 4 (of 11)
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2011/2012
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 9024 4.0 2256 1
    Biology 16733 10.5 1594 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 19067 14.0 1362 1
    Art 9133 7.0 1305 2
    Computer Science 12818 11.0 1166 2
    Anthropology 8127 7.0 1162 2
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17036 15.3 1114 3
    History 8724 8.0 1091 3
    Psychology 16253 15.0 1084 3
    English and World Languages 17307 16.0 1082 4
    Philosophy 6006 6.0 1001 4
    Criminal Justice 6951 7.0 993 4
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 4952 5.0 991 5
    Finance 3858 4.0 965 5
    Legal Studies 2771 3.0 924 5
    Communication Arts 12916 14.0 923 6
    Marketing 6387 7.0 913 6
    Environmental Studies 6273 7.0 897 6
    Management 9366 11.0 852 7
    Physics 3371 4.0 843 7
    Chemistry 6730 8.0 842 7
    Research and Advanced Studies 5818 7.0 832 8
    Economics 3291 4.0 823 8
    Social Work 7981 10.0 799 8
    Accounting 7560 10.0 757 9
    Government 3606 5.0 722 9
    Theatre 3523 5.0 705 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7485 11.0 681 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18823 29.0 650 10
    Music 4414 7.0 631 10
    Nursing 4903 9.0 545 11
    Management Information Systems 1461 3.0 487 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1350 3.0 450 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2012/2013
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 11819 6.0 1970 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 22668 15.0 1512 1
    Art 9311 7.0 1331 1
    Biology 17727 13.5 1314 2
    Philosophy 6383 5.0 1277 2
    Economics 3502 3.0 1168 2
    Anthropology 8391 8.0 1049 3
    English and World Languages 17654 17.0 1039 3
    Criminal Justice 7000 7.0 1000 3
    Finance 3958 4.0 990 4
    Computer Science 12644 13.0 973 4
    Psychology 15498 16.0 969 4
    Environmental Studies 6673 7.0 954 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 18081 19.3 937 5
    Communication Arts 12971 14.0 927 5
    History 8177 9.0 909 6
    Physics 3504 4.0 876 6
    Government 4232 5.0 847 6
    Chemistry 7148 9.0 795 7
    Management 9426 12.0 786 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6086 8.0 761 7
    Social Work 7415 10.0 742 8
    Nursing 6563 9.0 730 8
    Music 4716 7.0 674 8
    Legal Studies 2678 4.0 670 9
    Marketing 5813 9.0 646 9
    Research and Advanced Studies 3840 6.0 640 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7642 12.0 637 10
    Theatre 3080 5.0 616 10
    Accounting 7867 13.0 606 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18371 32.0 575 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1187 3.0 396 11
    Management Information Systems 1171 3.0 391 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2013/2014
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 14612 6.0 2436 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 20268 13.0 1560 1
    Economics 3915 3.0 1305 1
    Legal Studies 2492 2.0 1246 2
    Biology 16742 13.5 1241 2
    Art 7799 7.0 1115 2
    Philosophy 5327 5.0 1066 3
    Computer Science 13429 13.0 1033 3
    Finance 3897 4.0 975 3
    English and World Languages 16479 17.0 970 4
    Psychology 15464 16.0 967 4
    Anthropology 7458 8.0 933 4
    Environmental Studies 6500 7.0 929 5
    Management 10801 12.0 901 5
    Criminal Justice 7146 8.0 894 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17666 20.0 884 6
    Communication Arts 12284 14.0 878 6
    History 7630 9.0 848 6
    Physics 3306 4.0 827 7
    Chemistry 7333 9.0 815 7
    Marketing 5653 7.0 808 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6419 8.0 803 8
    Government 4383 6.0 731 8
    Social Work 7703 11.0 701 8
    Accounting 7334 11.0 667 9
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 17988 30.0 600 9
    Music 4177 7.0 597 9
    Nursing 6823 11.8 581 10
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 6941 12.0 579 10
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1127 2.0 564 10
    Research and Advanced Studies 3342 6.0 558 11
    Theatre 2711 5.0 543 11
    Management Information Systems 1104 3.0 368 11


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 22.5 27.4 25.3 0.0 25.9 23.9 25.9 24.6 0.0 25.3 22.2 25.0 25.2 0.0 24.6
    Upper 21.6 18.0 0.0 0.0 21.3 19.9 20.0 0.0 0.0 19.9 21.8 7.0 0.0 0.0 20.5
    Graduate 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 9.5 3.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 16.0% 59.1% 24.9% 0.0% 16.7% 65.3% 17.9% 0.0% 12.9% 79.6% 7.5% 0.0%
    Upper 94.8% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 98.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Graduate 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.4% 3.6% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Total 34.4% 46.5% 19.1% 0.0% 33.3% 52.5% 14.2% 0.0% 30.6% 63.5% 6.0% 0.0%


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Undergraduate 40 ( 18.5%) 44 ( 19.4%) 32 ( 15.1%)
    Graduate 9 ( 90.0%) 8 ( 88.9%) 7 (100.0%)