To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • Criminal Justice
Faculty Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Matthew Crow N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sara Evans N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Natalie Goulette N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Susan Harrell N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Richard Hough N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Kathrine Johnson N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Chang-Bae Lee N/A* 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
John Smykla N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Jamie Snyder N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cheryl Swanson N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Kimberly Tatum N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Department Total N/A* 6.0 7.0 7.0 8.0

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2014 - 2015 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: Criminal Justice

New Line Request
  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      Statewide employment projections for 2013-2021 by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (http://www.floridajobs.org/labor-market-information/data-center/statistical-programs/employment-projections) project 9.9% growth in protective service occupations; 7.4% growth for probation officers and correctional treatment specialists; 14.9% growth for forensic science technicians; and 15.3% growth for postsecondary criminal justice teachers. The United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/home.htm) projects the following growth projections nationwide for 2012-2022: correctional officers, 5%; police officers, 5%; private investigators, 11%; forensic science technicians, 6%. These projections bode well for criminal justice majors, especially given the growing demand for applicants with bachelor’s and master’s degrees. For example, the Escambia County Sheriff’s Office recently initiated a new program that aims to hire students nearing graduation or recently graduated to employ them while they complete the law enforcement academy and pay for their academy training.

    • Florida Board of Governors Areas of Strategic Emphasis      

    • Accreditation Requirements

      The Department of Criminal Justice currently consists of seven (7) tenure track faculty (including the chair), one (1) full-time instructor, and one (1) part-time instructor. One tenured faculty member is assigned full-time to FWB and one full-time instructor is assigned one-quarter time to FWB. Two of four tenured faculty members will depart UWF after this year. One new tenure-track assistant professor will join the University for the 2014-2015 academic year. Currently, there are a total of 19 course sections taught by faculty members on Pensacola and Online campuses each semester. The Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice program has seven core classes and each course is taught every semester, with multiple sections of several of the courses often offered. Four to five graduate courses are offered each semester. Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS) program certification standards require that all core courses be taught by full-time regular faculty. In addition, only full-time faculty teach graduate courses (SACS requires a terminal degree in the discipline for instructors at the graduate level. There are no known individuals in the local community who possess a Ph.D. in the discipline who can teach as adjuncts). As a result, each semester between 12 and 15 courses must be taught by full-time faculty, which leaves as few as four elective courses being taught by full-time faculty. Additional faculty in the department would help to improve the quality of instruction by allowing more elective courses to be taught by full-time faculty while meeting ACJS standards. In addition, criminal justice class sizes are very large. Additional faculty would allow us to maintain and improve the high-quality, high-impact educational experiences afforded by the small class sizes valued by UWF students.

    • Community/Visibility

      Criminal Justice faculty are highly engaged in the university, community, and their profession, which results in positive exposure for UWF (visibility). Among the current CJ faculty are the UWF Faculty Senate President, Faculty Senate Secretary, COPS Council Chair-elect, Graduate Council Chair, and a SACSCOC Writing Team Member, plus participation on numerous other committees. Clearly, CJ faculty give of themselves for the advancement of the University. CJ faculty have received numerous recognitions for their high-quality, including a UWF Distinguished University Professorship, two UWF Distinguished Teaching Awards, and a UWF Distinguished Research & Creative Activities Award. CJ faculty are currently engaged with numerous community agencies, including the Northern District of Florida Federal Court, Favor House, Escambia County Sheriff’s Office, Escambia County Jail, Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office and others. They are also highly active researchers, with articles appearing in top criminal justice/criminology journals and several books published. Additional faculty would improve the University’s visibility given the department’s culture of active community engagement and quality scholarship, which contributes to the visibility and reputation of the UWF brand.

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    For the Spring 2014 semester, 18 out of 21 undergraduate classes offered on the Pensacola campus or online had enrollments of at least 95% of the class limit (one course had a limit of 55, two had a limit of 45, and one had a limit of 30; all other limits were set at 40). Nearly all of our online courses have enrollments far above recommended levels. Enrollment at the FWB campus, while lower than on the main and online campuses, was strong, with at least 23 students enrolled in three of the four classes offered in FWB. However, with one tenured faculty member assigned full-time to FWB and one instructor assigned one-quarter time to FWB, classes on the main and online campuses are a pressure point. The department’s upper division average class size is at least 9.1 students higher than the average in all other departments in the college, according to the data available in the faculty line request form. The department has hired five new adjuncts in the past two years. The number of practitioners in the field who hold a master’s degree is very low, and most of them are only qualified and/or interested in teaching our basic (core) classes; however, our disciplines certification standards call for full-time faculty to teach in the core. The department faculty are very active in research, highly engaged in service both within and outside of the institution, and are recognized as excellent teachers (two faculty members have been awarded SGA Distinguished Teaching Awards). Nevertheless, the stress of such a high number of student credit hours per FTE jeopardizes both faculty productivity and morale.

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

    At the conclusion of the 2013-2014 academic year, the department will have five tenure-track faculty members, one of which is assigned full-time to the FWB campus and one of which serves as department chair. One new tenure-earning faculty member will join the department for the 2-14-2015 academic year as a replacement for one of the two tenured faculty members departing the university. In addition to excellence in teaching, the department has maintained very active research productivity and community engagement. The department faculty also engage students in numerous research projects. The department houses approximately 400 majors. The addition of a tenure-earning faculty member will enable the department to continue its commitment to these high-impact learning experiences for students and will serve to continue improving the visibility of the department and university through its research and work with community agencies.

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    A new faculty member will teach the core curriculum for the undergraduate and graduate programs and will also contribute to the elective offerings. The new faculty member will teach three classes per semester while maintaining an active research and service agenda. A new faculty line will allow the department to offer additional course sections for both the core and elective course offerings and will help to reduce the high SCH/FTE ratio and class sizes.



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    We are currently seeking new qualified adjuncts, but adjuncts are not able to teach core and graduate level courses due to the requirements for full-time instructors with terminal degrees for core classes and graduate classes. There is a scarcity of qualified adjuncts in the local area. The workload is currently being covered by increasing class sizes.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 +/-
    Undergraduate
    21053A: CRIMINAL JUSTICE  303   338   346   387   352  ↑ 16%
    21053D: CRIM JUST/FORENSIC  2   0   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    22013G: ISS/CHILD & SOCTY  32   49   50   46   42  ↑ 31%
    2105: CRIMINL JUS/NON-DEG  1   1   0   1   1 
    =
    2105 U: CRIM JUS/UG/NON-DEGR  4   3   6   6   3  ↓ 25%
    TOTAL 342 391 402 440 398 ↑ 16%
    Graduate
    21055A: CRIMINAL JUSTICE  23   25   34   28   25  ↑  9%
    30995A: MSA/CRIM JUST ADMIN  10   2   2   1   0  ↓ ∞
    2105 G: CJ/GRAD/NONDEGREE  2   1   2   0   2 
    =
    TOTAL 35 28 38 29 27 ↓ 23%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Undergraduate
    21053A: CRIMINAL JUSTICE  93   91   89   84   87  ↓  6%
    22013G: ISS/CHILD & SOCTY  3   13   19   18   13  ↑ 333%
    TOTAL 96 104 108 102 100 ↑  4%
    Graduate
    21055A: CRIMINAL JUSTICE  2   7   10   12   8  ↑ 300%
    30995A: MSA/CRIM JUST ADMIN  3   2   0   0   1  ↓ 67%
    TOTAL 5 9 10 12 9 ↑ 80%


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

    N/A. 21053D: Crim Just/Forensic was deleted.

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    N/A

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Lower
    564 363 495 588 444 ↓ 21.28%
    Upper
    4639 4908 4880 4927 5161 ↑ 11.25%
    Graduate
    387 267 375 312 318 ↓ 17.83%
    Total
    5590 5538 5750 5827 5923 ↑  5.96%
    Weighted Total
    6750 6680 6951 7000 7146 ↑  5.87%


    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0


    Departmental Growth Capacity
      2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
    Weighted SCH/FTE 993 1000 894
    Growth Capacity Rank 4 (of 11) 3 (of 11) 5 (of 11)
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2011/2012
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 9024 4.0 2256 1
    Biology 16733 10.5 1594 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 19067 14.0 1362 1
    Art 9133 7.0 1305 2
    Computer Science 12818 11.0 1166 2
    Anthropology 8127 7.0 1162 2
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17036 15.3 1114 3
    History 8724 8.0 1091 3
    Psychology 16253 15.0 1084 3
    English and World Languages 17307 16.0 1082 4
    Philosophy 6006 6.0 1001 4
    Criminal Justice 6951 7.0 993 4
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 4952 5.0 991 5
    Finance 3858 4.0 965 5
    Legal Studies 2771 3.0 924 5
    Communication Arts 12916 14.0 923 6
    Marketing 6387 7.0 913 6
    Environmental Studies 6273 7.0 897 6
    Management 9366 11.0 852 7
    Physics 3371 4.0 843 7
    Chemistry 6730 8.0 842 7
    Research and Advanced Studies 5818 7.0 832 8
    Economics 3291 4.0 823 8
    Social Work 7981 10.0 799 8
    Accounting 7560 10.0 757 9
    Government 3606 5.0 722 9
    Theatre 3523 5.0 705 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7485 11.0 681 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18823 29.0 650 10
    Music 4414 7.0 631 10
    Nursing 4903 9.0 545 11
    Management Information Systems 1461 3.0 487 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1350 3.0 450 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2012/2013
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 11819 6.0 1970 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 22668 15.0 1512 1
    Art 9311 7.0 1331 1
    Biology 17727 13.5 1314 2
    Philosophy 6383 5.0 1277 2
    Economics 3502 3.0 1168 2
    Anthropology 8391 8.0 1049 3
    English and World Languages 17654 17.0 1039 3
    Criminal Justice 7000 7.0 1000 3
    Finance 3958 4.0 990 4
    Computer Science 12644 13.0 973 4
    Psychology 15498 16.0 969 4
    Environmental Studies 6673 7.0 954 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 18081 19.3 937 5
    Communication Arts 12971 14.0 927 5
    History 8177 9.0 909 6
    Physics 3504 4.0 876 6
    Government 4232 5.0 847 6
    Chemistry 7148 9.0 795 7
    Management 9426 12.0 786 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6086 8.0 761 7
    Social Work 7415 10.0 742 8
    Nursing 6563 9.0 730 8
    Music 4716 7.0 674 8
    Legal Studies 2678 4.0 670 9
    Marketing 5813 9.0 646 9
    Research and Advanced Studies 3840 6.0 640 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7642 12.0 637 10
    Theatre 3080 5.0 616 10
    Accounting 7867 13.0 606 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18371 32.0 575 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1187 3.0 396 11
    Management Information Systems 1171 3.0 391 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2013/2014
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 14612 6.0 2436 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 20268 13.0 1560 1
    Economics 3915 3.0 1305 1
    Legal Studies 2492 2.0 1246 2
    Biology 16742 13.5 1241 2
    Art 7799 7.0 1115 2
    Philosophy 5327 5.0 1066 3
    Computer Science 13429 13.0 1033 3
    Finance 3897 4.0 975 3
    English and World Languages 16479 17.0 970 4
    Psychology 15464 16.0 967 4
    Anthropology 7458 8.0 933 4
    Environmental Studies 6500 7.0 929 5
    Management 10801 12.0 901 5
    Criminal Justice 7146 8.0 894 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17666 20.0 884 6
    Communication Arts 12284 14.0 878 6
    History 7630 9.0 848 6
    Physics 3306 4.0 827 7
    Chemistry 7333 9.0 815 7
    Marketing 5653 7.0 808 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6419 8.0 803 8
    Government 4383 6.0 731 8
    Social Work 7703 11.0 701 8
    Accounting 7334 11.0 667 9
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 17988 30.0 600 9
    Music 4177 7.0 597 9
    Nursing 6823 11.8 581 10
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 6941 12.0 579 10
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1127 2.0 564 10
    Research and Advanced Studies 3342 6.0 558 11
    Theatre 2711 5.0 543 11
    Management Information Systems 1104 3.0 368 11


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 59.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.0 59.0 44.0 0.0 0.0 51.5 55.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 47.5
    Upper 36.7 38.1 0.0 0.0 37.2 35.1 31.1 0.0 35.0 34.0 38.6 35.4 0.0 20.0 36.8
    Graduate 9.3 0.0 0.0 15.0 10.8 11.6 12.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 8.5 17.0 0.0 0.0 10.2


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 70.3% 29.7% 0.0% 0.0% 50.5% 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% 37.2% 62.8% 0.0% 0.0%
    Upper 62.1% 27.5% 10.4% 0.0% 63.3% 32.3% 0.0% 4.4% 62.8% 33.6% 0.0% 3.6%
    Graduate 68.2% 18.2% 0.0% 13.6% 95.3% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% 79.3% 20.7% 0.0% 0.0%
    Total 63.2% 27.1% 8.9% 0.8% 63.8% 32.5% 0.0% 3.7% 61.5% 35.3% 0.0% 3.2%


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Undergraduate 1 ( 2.0%) 8 ( 15.4%) 2 ( 4.1%)
    Graduate 5 ( 55.6%) 8 ( 80.0%) 6 ( 75.0%)