To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • Environmental Studies
Faculty Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Chasidy Hobbs N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Zhiyong Hu N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Johan Liebens N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Klaus Meyer-Arendt N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Jason Ortegren N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Matthew Schwartz N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
John Waldron N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Department Total N/A* 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2014 - 2015 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: Environmental Studies

New Line Request
  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      GIS is one of the fastest-growing, high-tech career paths. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics lists the geospatial technology industry, within the architectural and engineering occupations group, as one of the top 10 fastest growing careers between 2002 and 2012.

      The GIS specialization for the MSA is in direct response to the increasing value in using GIS technology to manage critical resources, infrastructures, public lands, disaster response, and homeland security in support of making well informed public policy decisions. Job descriptions of an increasing number of positions in both government agencies and private businesses are being rewritten to require employees to use GIS and related technologies. With this kind of growth, more and more employees already in manager positions are being asked to administer their organizations GIS department staff and resources without formal training or extensive GIS background. Grandfathering-in of under-qualified staff can be seen from the local to national - even international levels. This degree is designed to enhance the GIS proficiency of professionals working in government, business and non-profit organizations. With such proficiency these professionals are well-equipped to ingegrate and apply this relatively new technology in their respective fields.

    • Florida Board of Governors Areas of Strategic Emphasis      

      Economic Development - STEM

    • Accreditation Requirements

      None

    • Community/Visibility

      The Department of Environmental Studies is currently developing a massively open online course (MOOC) in GIS to expand information about GIS, which is already well-advertised both on-campus and nationally through our face-to-face and online GIS Certificate programs. UWF is also pursuing Professional Science Master's designation for the MSA in GIS, which would provide additional visibility and marketing for the program to be supported by this faculty member.

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    This line is requested to support the new MSA in GIS specialization, which is a fully online graduate program aimed at working professionals in the GIS field. The requested professor line will be the primary faculty member in the new MSA program and will be responsible for overseeing all GIS content. S/he may also help to invigorate and support GIS courses in the face-to-face program, which has considerable student interest, but could be better marketed within UWF by an involved GIScientist professor.

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

    This tenure-earning position will both support a STEM graduate-program and further research in the realm of GIS, while he;ping to expand the demand of GIS at UWF beyond its current applications in Environmental Studies and Anthropology & Archaeology. As a tenure-earning faculty member, the professor will be able to properly engage in research that is required for these efforts.

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    teaching and developing graduate-level courses within the MSA in GIS program. Teaching load would be three courses in fall and spring and 1-2 courses in summer. The professor will be expected to supervise undergraduate and graduate research projects related to GIS, particularly web GIS.



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    This is a new program. Currently, we are planning to staff these positions with new adjunct hires; however, many of our existing online GIS adjuncts do not hold terminal degrees that will allow them to lead a graduate-level course.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 +/-
    Undergraduate
    21103I: ENVRNMNTL ST/NAT SCI  63   74   79   78   71  ↑ 13%
    21103J: ENVRNMNTL ST/ENV POL  56   50   37   17   5  ↓ 91%
    21103K: ENVIRONMENTAL ST/GEO  47   46   32   18   5  ↓ 89%
    21103L: ENVRNMNTL SC/ENV MGM  0   0   9   44   60  ↑ ∞
    40063A: OCEANOGRAPHY  29   27   51   47   21  ↓ 28%
    2110 U: EVR/UG/NON-DEGREE  32   28   24   25   22  ↓ 31%
    4006 U: OCEANOGR/UG/NON-DEG  1   2   0   5   0  ↓ ∞
    TOTAL 228 227 232 234 184 ↓ 19%
    Graduate
    21105A: ENVIRONMENTAL SCI  17   24   19   27   26  ↑ 53%
    2110 G: EVR/GRAD/NON-DEGREE  18   19   16   12   22  ↑ 22%
    TOTAL 35 43 35 39 48 ↑ 37%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Undergraduate
    21103I: ENVRNMNTL ST/NAT SCI  4   11   10   18   16  ↑ 300%
    21103J: ENVRNMNTL ST/ENV POL  9   12   20   9   5  ↓ 44%
    21103K: ENVIRONMENTAL ST/GEO  14   15   10   13   4  ↓ 71%
    21103L: ENVRNMNTL SC/ENV MGM  0   0   0   0   6  ↑ ∞
    40063A: OCEANOGRAPHY  3   4   5   7   10  ↑ 233%
    TOTAL 30 42 45 47 41 ↑ 37%
    Graduate
    21105A: ENVIRONMENTAL SCI  9   4   5   9   8  ↓ 11%
    TOTAL 9 4 5 9 8 ↓ 11%


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

    The department transitioned to a new curriculum in 2013 and did away with previous specializations in Environmental policy and geography; those programs are currently being taught out, while new students are enrolling the Natural Science and Environmental Management specializations.

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    N/A

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Lower
    2389 2426 2449 3030 2848 ↑ 19.21%
    Upper
    2780 2587 2920 2624 2658 ↓  4.39%
    Graduate
    216 238 200 309 289 ↑ 33.80%
    Total
    5385 5251 5569 5963 5795 ↑  7.61%
    Weighted Total
    6071 5911 6273 6673 6500 ↑  7.07%


    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0


    Departmental Growth Capacity
      2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
    Weighted SCH/FTE 897 954 929
    Growth Capacity Rank 6 (of 11) 5 (of 11) 5 (of 11)
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2011/2012
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 9024 4.0 2256 1
    Biology 16733 10.5 1594 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 19067 14.0 1362 1
    Art 9133 7.0 1305 2
    Computer Science 12818 11.0 1166 2
    Anthropology 8127 7.0 1162 2
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17036 15.3 1114 3
    History 8724 8.0 1091 3
    Psychology 16253 15.0 1084 3
    English and World Languages 17307 16.0 1082 4
    Philosophy 6006 6.0 1001 4
    Criminal Justice 6951 7.0 993 4
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 4952 5.0 991 5
    Finance 3858 4.0 965 5
    Legal Studies 2771 3.0 924 5
    Communication Arts 12916 14.0 923 6
    Marketing 6387 7.0 913 6
    Environmental Studies 6273 7.0 897 6
    Management 9366 11.0 852 7
    Physics 3371 4.0 843 7
    Chemistry 6730 8.0 842 7
    Research and Advanced Studies 5818 7.0 832 8
    Economics 3291 4.0 823 8
    Social Work 7981 10.0 799 8
    Accounting 7560 10.0 757 9
    Government 3606 5.0 722 9
    Theatre 3523 5.0 705 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7485 11.0 681 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18823 29.0 650 10
    Music 4414 7.0 631 10
    Nursing 4903 9.0 545 11
    Management Information Systems 1461 3.0 487 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1350 3.0 450 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2012/2013
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 11819 6.0 1970 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 22668 15.0 1512 1
    Art 9311 7.0 1331 1
    Biology 17727 13.5 1314 2
    Philosophy 6383 5.0 1277 2
    Economics 3502 3.0 1168 2
    Anthropology 8391 8.0 1049 3
    English and World Languages 17654 17.0 1039 3
    Criminal Justice 7000 7.0 1000 3
    Finance 3958 4.0 990 4
    Computer Science 12644 13.0 973 4
    Psychology 15498 16.0 969 4
    Environmental Studies 6673 7.0 954 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 18081 19.3 937 5
    Communication Arts 12971 14.0 927 5
    History 8177 9.0 909 6
    Physics 3504 4.0 876 6
    Government 4232 5.0 847 6
    Chemistry 7148 9.0 795 7
    Management 9426 12.0 786 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6086 8.0 761 7
    Social Work 7415 10.0 742 8
    Nursing 6563 9.0 730 8
    Music 4716 7.0 674 8
    Legal Studies 2678 4.0 670 9
    Marketing 5813 9.0 646 9
    Research and Advanced Studies 3840 6.0 640 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7642 12.0 637 10
    Theatre 3080 5.0 616 10
    Accounting 7867 13.0 606 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18371 32.0 575 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1187 3.0 396 11
    Management Information Systems 1171 3.0 391 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2013/2014
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 14612 6.0 2436 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 20268 13.0 1560 1
    Economics 3915 3.0 1305 1
    Legal Studies 2492 2.0 1246 2
    Biology 16742 13.5 1241 2
    Art 7799 7.0 1115 2
    Philosophy 5327 5.0 1066 3
    Computer Science 13429 13.0 1033 3
    Finance 3897 4.0 975 3
    English and World Languages 16479 17.0 970 4
    Psychology 15464 16.0 967 4
    Anthropology 7458 8.0 933 4
    Environmental Studies 6500 7.0 929 5
    Management 10801 12.0 901 5
    Criminal Justice 7146 8.0 894 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17666 20.0 884 6
    Communication Arts 12284 14.0 878 6
    History 7630 9.0 848 6
    Physics 3306 4.0 827 7
    Chemistry 7333 9.0 815 7
    Marketing 5653 7.0 808 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6419 8.0 803 8
    Government 4383 6.0 731 8
    Social Work 7703 11.0 701 8
    Accounting 7334 11.0 667 9
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 17988 30.0 600 9
    Music 4177 7.0 597 9
    Nursing 6823 11.8 581 10
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 6941 12.0 579 10
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1127 2.0 564 10
    Research and Advanced Studies 3342 6.0 558 11
    Theatre 2711 5.0 543 11
    Management Information Systems 1104 3.0 368 11


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 57.5 54.6 0.0 0.0 55.4 73.8 55.3 0.0 0.0 64.5 66.6 65.0 0.0 0.0 66.1
    Upper 31.6 31.0 0.0 0.0 31.4 26.5 25.2 0.0 22.0 25.8 27.0 39.3 0.0 18.0 30.8
    Graduate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 48.9% 51.1% 0.0% 0.0% 60.5% 39.5% 0.0% 0.0% 68.6% 31.4% 0.0% 0.0%
    Upper 70.0% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 75.4% 23.7% 0.0% 0.9% 50.7% 44.4% 3.4% 1.5%
    Graduate 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Total 60.6% 39.4% 0.0% 0.0% 68.1% 31.5% 0.0% 0.4% 61.0% 36.7% 1.6% 0.7%


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Undergraduate 7 ( 16.7%) 9 ( 18.8%) 3 ( 7.0%)
    Graduate 2 (100.0%) 3 ( 75.0%) 5 (100.0%)