To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • Computer Science
Faculty Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Sikha Bagui N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
John Bolyard N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Steven Case N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
John Coffey N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Dennis Edwards N/A* 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thomas Gilbar N/A* 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Bilal Gonen N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Jacalyn Huband N/A* 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
James Lewis N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bernd Owsnicki-Klewe N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Anthony Pinto N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lakshmi Prayaga N/A* 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thomas Reichherzer N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Edward Rodgers N/A* 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sharon Simmons N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dallas Snider N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Leonard Ter Haar N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Laura White N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Norman Wilde N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Department Total N/A* 14.0 11.0 13.0 13.0

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2014 - 2015 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: Computer Science

Replacement Line Request
  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      UWF's Computer Science department mainly serves the local region. From a Pensacola Chamber meeting I went to, I found that 60% of the total workforce demand in this region is in the IT sector. There is a great need for Software developers and programmers, Information Security specialists, Network Administrators, Database Administrators and Developers. There are already a big number of current openings in the field and we were discussing how UWF could address these needs in the immediate future. This position will directly help in workforce development/demand.

    • Florida Board of Governors Areas of Strategic Emphasis      

      One of the main areas of strategic emphasis of the Florida Board of Governors is to graduate students on time. If we cannot hire a faculty member in this replacement line, we will not be able to offer courses that are critical to students graduating on time.

    • Accreditation Requirements

      We are working toward ABET accreditation. We are going to have to start assessing our courses. Having a faculty in the replacement line will help gear up the courses for accreditation. We cannot expect this from adjuncts.

    • Community/Visibility

      Offering a good and strong program is very important for UWF since we are the major work force developer in the area. Having a full time instructor will help us deliver strong programs. Also, as we develop the Cybersecurity component, strong programming skills are very important.

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    I am requesting for this replacement line to replace Mr. Jim Lewis. Mr. Jim Lewis taught 4 full sections (almost 200 students per semester) of hard core programming classes. We would not be able to find adjuncts to teach programming at such high levels (with so much theory).

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    Teaching 4 courses per semester.



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    Mr. Jim Lewis is still teaching the courses. He plans to retire at the end of Spring, 2015, and we will not be able to manage his teaching load without a replacement.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 +/-
    Undergraduate
    07013D: COMP SC-COMP INF SYS  69   84   101   97   102  ↑ 48%
    07013G: COMP SC-COMPUTER SCI  150   152   146   138   138  ↓  8%
    07013H: COMP SC-SOFTWARE ENG  22   35   66   95   118  ↑ 436%
    07113C: INT INF TECH/COM TEC  23   3   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    07113G: INT INFO TECH/DIG EN  23   13   11   13   8  ↓ 65%
    07113H: INT INF TECH/HUM CPT  3   10   3   1   0  ↓ ∞
    07113J: INT INF TEC/INF TECH  40   78   114   118   112  ↑ 180%
    0701 U: COMP SCI/UG/NON-DEGR  15   8   8   24   19  ↑ 27%
    0701 X: COMP SCI/NON-DEG  1   2   0   1   1 
    =
    TOTAL 346 385 449 487 498 ↑ 44%
    Graduate
    07015A: COMP SC-COMPUTER SCI  18   16   24   12   11  ↓ 39%
    07015B: COMP SC-SOFTWARE ENG  110   114   81   77   63  ↓ 43%
    07015I: COMP SC-DATABASE SYS  0   15   35   36   42  ↑ ∞
    30995I: MSA/DATABASE ADMIN  13   16   10   11   9  ↓ 31%
    30995J: MSA/SOFTWARE ENG ADM  3   5   4   5   3 
    =
    0701 G: COMP SCI/GRAD/NON-DR  6   10   14   5   9  ↑ 50%
    520K G: MSA/SOFTWARE /GR/ND  0   2   0   3   0 
    =
    TOTAL 150 178 168 149 137 ↓  9%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Undergraduate
    07013D: COMP SC-COMP INF SYS  18   11   13   11   13  ↓ 28%
    07013G: COMP SC-COMPUTER SCI  17   27   26   17   24  ↑ 41%
    07013H: COMP SC-SOFTWARE ENG  1   1   3   6   9  ↑ 800%
    07113C: INT INF TECH/COM TEC  10   1   1   0   0  ↓ ∞
    07113G: INT INFO TECH/DIG EN  8   2   5   2   3  ↓ 63%
    07113H: INT INF TECH/HUM CPT  2   1   0   1   0  ↓ ∞
    07113J: INT INF TEC/INF TECH  1   7   21   21   20  ↑ 1900%
    TOTAL 57 50 69 58 69 ↑ 21%
    Graduate
    07015A: COMP SC-COMPUTER SCI  8   4   7   7   5  ↓ 38%
    07015B: COMP SC-SOFTWARE ENG  38   60   28   26   25  ↓ 34%
    07015I: COMP SC-DATABASE SYS  0   0   3   12   12  ↑ ∞
    30995I: MSA/DATABASE ADMIN  4   6   0   3   2  ↓ 50%
    30995J: MSA/SOFTWARE ENG ADM  0   1   0   2   2  ↑ ∞
    TOTAL 50 71 38 50 46 ↓  8%


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

    The undergraduate degree specializations with below 15 majors are INT INF TECH/HUM CPT and INT INF TECH/DIG EN. INT INF TECH/HUM CPT has actually been deleted. INT INF TECH/DIG EN is being re-vamped.

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    The two graduate programs with fewer than 10 majors are: MSA/DATABASE ADM (9 students) and MSA/SOFTWARE ENG ADM (3 students). We have received quite a few applicants for MSA/DATABASE ADM, so this specialization will continue, and we deleted the MSA/SOFTWARE ENG ADM in the last CCR round.

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Lower
    2529 2484 2763 2709 2742 ↑  8.42%
    Upper
    5430 5916 6154 6386 7131 ↑ 31.33%
    Graduate
    1888 1819 1669 1420 1331 ↓ 29.50%
    Total
    9847 10219 10586 10515 11204 ↑ 13.78%
    Weighted Total
    12066 12494 12818 12644 13429 ↑ 11.30%


    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 10.0 10.0 6.0 9.0 9.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0


    Departmental Growth Capacity
      2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
    Weighted SCH/FTE 1166 973 1033
    Growth Capacity Rank 2 (of 11) 4 (of 11) 3 (of 11)
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2011/2012
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 9024 4.0 2256 1
    Biology 16733 10.5 1594 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 19067 14.0 1362 1
    Art 9133 7.0 1305 2
    Computer Science 12818 11.0 1166 2
    Anthropology 8127 7.0 1162 2
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17036 15.3 1114 3
    History 8724 8.0 1091 3
    Psychology 16253 15.0 1084 3
    English and World Languages 17307 16.0 1082 4
    Philosophy 6006 6.0 1001 4
    Criminal Justice 6951 7.0 993 4
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 4952 5.0 991 5
    Finance 3858 4.0 965 5
    Legal Studies 2771 3.0 924 5
    Communication Arts 12916 14.0 923 6
    Marketing 6387 7.0 913 6
    Environmental Studies 6273 7.0 897 6
    Management 9366 11.0 852 7
    Physics 3371 4.0 843 7
    Chemistry 6730 8.0 842 7
    Research and Advanced Studies 5818 7.0 832 8
    Economics 3291 4.0 823 8
    Social Work 7981 10.0 799 8
    Accounting 7560 10.0 757 9
    Government 3606 5.0 722 9
    Theatre 3523 5.0 705 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7485 11.0 681 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18823 29.0 650 10
    Music 4414 7.0 631 10
    Nursing 4903 9.0 545 11
    Management Information Systems 1461 3.0 487 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1350 3.0 450 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2012/2013
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 11819 6.0 1970 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 22668 15.0 1512 1
    Art 9311 7.0 1331 1
    Biology 17727 13.5 1314 2
    Philosophy 6383 5.0 1277 2
    Economics 3502 3.0 1168 2
    Anthropology 8391 8.0 1049 3
    English and World Languages 17654 17.0 1039 3
    Criminal Justice 7000 7.0 1000 3
    Finance 3958 4.0 990 4
    Computer Science 12644 13.0 973 4
    Psychology 15498 16.0 969 4
    Environmental Studies 6673 7.0 954 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 18081 19.3 937 5
    Communication Arts 12971 14.0 927 5
    History 8177 9.0 909 6
    Physics 3504 4.0 876 6
    Government 4232 5.0 847 6
    Chemistry 7148 9.0 795 7
    Management 9426 12.0 786 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6086 8.0 761 7
    Social Work 7415 10.0 742 8
    Nursing 6563 9.0 730 8
    Music 4716 7.0 674 8
    Legal Studies 2678 4.0 670 9
    Marketing 5813 9.0 646 9
    Research and Advanced Studies 3840 6.0 640 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7642 12.0 637 10
    Theatre 3080 5.0 616 10
    Accounting 7867 13.0 606 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18371 32.0 575 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1187 3.0 396 11
    Management Information Systems 1171 3.0 391 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2013/2014
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 14612 6.0 2436 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 20268 13.0 1560 1
    Economics 3915 3.0 1305 1
    Legal Studies 2492 2.0 1246 2
    Biology 16742 13.5 1241 2
    Art 7799 7.0 1115 2
    Philosophy 5327 5.0 1066 3
    Computer Science 13429 13.0 1033 3
    Finance 3897 4.0 975 3
    English and World Languages 16479 17.0 970 4
    Psychology 15464 16.0 967 4
    Anthropology 7458 8.0 933 4
    Environmental Studies 6500 7.0 929 5
    Management 10801 12.0 901 5
    Criminal Justice 7146 8.0 894 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17666 20.0 884 6
    Communication Arts 12284 14.0 878 6
    History 7630 9.0 848 6
    Physics 3306 4.0 827 7
    Chemistry 7333 9.0 815 7
    Marketing 5653 7.0 808 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6419 8.0 803 8
    Government 4383 6.0 731 8
    Social Work 7703 11.0 701 8
    Accounting 7334 11.0 667 9
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 17988 30.0 600 9
    Music 4177 7.0 597 9
    Nursing 6823 11.8 581 10
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 6941 12.0 579 10
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1127 2.0 564 10
    Research and Advanced Studies 3342 6.0 558 11
    Theatre 2711 5.0 543 11
    Management Information Systems 1104 3.0 368 11


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 62.8 28.0 0.0 32.0 51.7 47.7 25.3 0.0 0.0 41.0 53.6 28.0 0.0 0.0 45.9
    Upper 35.3 31.6 0.0 37.0 33.6 28.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 27.8 31.8 31.0 0.0 0.0 31.4
    Graduate 8.3 12.3 0.0 16.0 10.2 12.3 11.3 0.0 14.0 12.1 12.7 13.2 0.0 0.0 12.9


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 71.2% 21.0% 0.0% 7.8% 78.5% 21.5% 0.0% 0.0% 77.8% 19.4% 0.0% 2.8%
    Upper 43.8% 47.5% 0.0% 8.8% 61.1% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 56.7% 43.3% 0.0% 0.0%
    Graduate 54.2% 39.8% 0.0% 6.0% 63.0% 33.9% 0.0% 3.2% 55.8% 35.8% 0.0% 8.3%
    Total 52.5% 39.4% 0.0% 8.1% 65.9% 33.7% 0.0% 0.4% 61.8% 36.5% 0.0% 1.6%


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Undergraduate 6 ( 7.6%) 11 ( 12.2%) 3 ( 3.4%)
    Graduate 25 ( 58.1%) 20 ( 57.1%) 17 ( 53.1%)