To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • Nursing
Faculty Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Julia Babb N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Crystal Bennett N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Angela Blackburn N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Laurel Boyd N/A* 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Janet Chubb N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8
Diane Gardner N/A* 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Faith Garrett N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Dianne Harris N/A* 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Lela Hobby-Burns N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Summer Kennedy N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Ermalynn Kiehl N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Eleanor Lewis N/A* 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Tina Majors N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Patricia Posey-Goodwin N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Brandy Strahan N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Linda Tibbits N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Geri Tuttell N/A* 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Camille Wilson N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Department Total N/A* 8.0 9.0 9.0 11.8

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2014 - 2015 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: Nursing

Replacement Line Request
  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      Nursing Chair, Tenure track position at the rank of Associate or Professor. that requires administrative experience and an earned doctorate in nursing or a related field.
      Nurses are a major workforce shortfall in health care which is the 2nd largest economic engine and employer in our region. Workforce Survey for Nursing Programs conducted by the Florida Center for Nursing and the Florida Board of Nursing indicate that than 50% of qualified applicants are turned away each year from nursing programs due to limited funding for faculty positions, faculty shortages, and limited clinical education space. Survey results from Florida’s nurse employers in 2011 revealed that 89 percent of responding hospitals and 65 percent of responding skilled nursing facilities hire new graduate nurses. Additionally, this analysis showed an estimated 6,746 new RN positions will be created in Florida in 2012. The aging nursing workforce coupled with the recent recommendations from the Institute of Medicine for increasing BSN prepared nurses in the workplace puts additional strain on our already overscheduled nursing faculty to keep up with student enrollment. Yet, we take only one cohort per year, leaving faculty, during the “off” semesters, to teach courses in which they have minimal expertise. Creating a second cohort each year that would begin during the spring (or summer) semester carries with it the following advantages for students and faculty (1) aligns courses with faculty expertise each semester, (2) provides clinical agencies UWF nursing students during each semester for more consistency,
      (3) better meets workforce demands
      (4) alleviates the need for students who are unsuccessful in one course to lay out one year before returning,
      (5) increases retention (performance metrics),
      (6) decreases time to graduation (performance metrics),
      (7) provides a greater number of BSN graduates each year (performance metrics)

    • Florida Board of Governors Areas of Strategic Emphasis      

      Nursing is one of the Florida BOG areas of strategic emphasis including:
      51.3801 Registered Nursing/Registered Nurse. HEALTH
      51.3803 Adult Health Nurse/Nursing. HEALTH
      51.3804 Nurse Anesthetist. HEALTH
      51.3805 Family Practice Nurse/Nursing. HEALTH
      51.3808 Nursing Science. HEALTH
      51.3809 Pediatric Nurse/Nursing. HEALTH
      51.3810 Psychiatric/Mental Health Nurse/Nursing. HEALTH
      51.3818 Nursing Practice. HEALTH

    • Accreditation Requirements

      The Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE), our accreditation body, under Standard II: Program Quality: Institutional Commitment and Resources, states that the chief nurse administrator: is a registered nurse (RN); holds a graduate degree in nursing; is academically and experientially qualified to accomplish the mission, goals, and expected student and faculty outcomes; is vested with the administrative authority to accomplish the mission, goals, and expected student and faculty outcomes; and provides effective leadership to the nursing unit in achieving its mission, goals, and expected student and faculty outcomes.
      Elaboration: The chief nurse administrator has budgetary, decision-making, and evaluation authority that is comparable to that of chief administrators of similar units in the institution. He or she consults, as appropriate, with faculty and other communities of interest, to make decisions to accomplish the mission, goals, and expected student and faculty outcomes. The chief nurse administrator is perceived by the communities of interest to be an effective leader of the nursing unit.

    • Community/Visibility

      A proven chief nurse administrator who is innovative and a visionary is needed to lead the department the Nursing program. A highly credentialed and experienced nurse executive would be able to work closely with local agency nurse administrators to manage a Department that continues to grow in volume and in programs.

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    An effective Chair for the Department of Nursing is critical to maintaining the quality of the program and the momentum experienced with program growth. It is also recognized that this person embrace the unique qualities of a small developing university and the need for interprofessional collaboration with multiple other health related departments.

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

    This person should possess an established record of teaching, scholarly achievement and service appropriate to a tenured faculty appointment, thus this line should be tenure earning.

    In addition the preferred candidate will possess
    •Strong record of visionary, collaborative leadership
    •Ability to be licensed as a registered nurse in Florida.
    •Record of successful implementation of initiatives in time of change and growth.
    •An earned doctorate in nursing or a related field.
    •Skills for success in building community partnerships and fiscal resources.

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    The overall health and success of the nursing program will depend on the skills and investment offered by this individual. As Chair of a dynamic department with a complex set of course offerings and personnel, the majority of workload will be spent in program management and administration. However, this individual must be prepared to teach a variety of courses on the graduate level courses in the MSN and the proposed Executive Nurse Leader DNP track. The load would most likely minimally consist of one graduate level, on-line courses in each year, with additional teaching as needed.



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    There is currently a doctorally prepared nurse administrator in the Chair position who has recently been appointed as Associate Dean of Health.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 +/-
    Undergraduate
    12033A: NURSING/RN-BSN  56   99   69   104   134  ↑ 139%
    12033D: NURSING/BSN  74   36   37   36   99  ↑ 34%
    12033N: PRE-BSN  225   294   329   393   342  ↑ 52%
    12033O: NURSING/RSN-BSN-OWC  2   0   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    1203: NSG/NON-DEGREE  1   0   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    1203 U: NURSING/UG/NON-DEG  5   9   9   13   8  ↑ 60%
    TOTAL 363 438 444 546 583 ↑ 61%
    Graduate
    12035B: NURSING/ADMIN  0   0   4   11   18  ↑ ∞
    12035C: NURSING/EDUC  0   0   5   5   8  ↑ ∞
    30995G: MSA/NURSING ADM  3   8   0   0   0  ↓ ∞
    1203 G: NSG/GRAD/NON-DEGREE  2   0   2   2   7  ↑ 250%
    TOTAL 5 8 11 18 33 ↑ 560%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Undergraduate
    12033A: NURSING/RN-BSN  12   55   65   66   128  ↑ 967%
    12033D: NURSING/BSN  33   29   38   34   38  ↑ 15%
    TOTAL 45 84 103 100 166 ↑ 269%
    Graduate
    12035B: NURSING/ADMIN  0   0   0   0   2  ↑ ∞
    12035C: NURSING/EDUC  0   0   0   1   2  ↑ ∞
    TOTAL 0 0 0 1 4 ↑ ∞


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

    No undergraduate degree specialization under 15 exists.

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    MSN is a young degree and is just building numbers. We are currently meeting with marketing for assistance with recruitment and considering development a proposal for a potential state school partnership with NWFSC and Jefferson Davis. The final specialization courses have one more semester of 2-4 students then will move to 7-12. If by next year we don't have significant increase in volume we will consider the impact of offering the specialty courses only once per year.

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Lower
    0 0 0 0 0
    =
    Upper
    3200 4227 3942 5193 5270 ↑ 64.69%
    Graduate
    0 42 108 207 312 ↑ ∞
    Total
    3200 4269 4050 5400 5582 ↑ 74.44%
    Weighted Total
    3840 5140 4903 6563 6823 ↑ 77.69%


    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 6.0 6.0 5.0 3.0 2.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 2.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 9.8


    Departmental Growth Capacity
      2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
    Weighted SCH/FTE 545 730 581
    Growth Capacity Rank 11 (of 11) 8 (of 11) 10 (of 11)
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2011/2012
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 9024 4.0 2256 1
    Biology 16733 10.5 1594 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 19067 14.0 1362 1
    Art 9133 7.0 1305 2
    Computer Science 12818 11.0 1166 2
    Anthropology 8127 7.0 1162 2
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17036 15.3 1114 3
    History 8724 8.0 1091 3
    Psychology 16253 15.0 1084 3
    English and World Languages 17307 16.0 1082 4
    Philosophy 6006 6.0 1001 4
    Criminal Justice 6951 7.0 993 4
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 4952 5.0 991 5
    Finance 3858 4.0 965 5
    Legal Studies 2771 3.0 924 5
    Communication Arts 12916 14.0 923 6
    Marketing 6387 7.0 913 6
    Environmental Studies 6273 7.0 897 6
    Management 9366 11.0 852 7
    Physics 3371 4.0 843 7
    Chemistry 6730 8.0 842 7
    Research and Advanced Studies 5818 7.0 832 8
    Economics 3291 4.0 823 8
    Social Work 7981 10.0 799 8
    Accounting 7560 10.0 757 9
    Government 3606 5.0 722 9
    Theatre 3523 5.0 705 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7485 11.0 681 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18823 29.0 650 10
    Music 4414 7.0 631 10
    Nursing 4903 9.0 545 11
    Management Information Systems 1461 3.0 487 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1350 3.0 450 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2012/2013
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 11819 6.0 1970 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 22668 15.0 1512 1
    Art 9311 7.0 1331 1
    Biology 17727 13.5 1314 2
    Philosophy 6383 5.0 1277 2
    Economics 3502 3.0 1168 2
    Anthropology 8391 8.0 1049 3
    English and World Languages 17654 17.0 1039 3
    Criminal Justice 7000 7.0 1000 3
    Finance 3958 4.0 990 4
    Computer Science 12644 13.0 973 4
    Psychology 15498 16.0 969 4
    Environmental Studies 6673 7.0 954 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 18081 19.3 937 5
    Communication Arts 12971 14.0 927 5
    History 8177 9.0 909 6
    Physics 3504 4.0 876 6
    Government 4232 5.0 847 6
    Chemistry 7148 9.0 795 7
    Management 9426 12.0 786 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6086 8.0 761 7
    Social Work 7415 10.0 742 8
    Nursing 6563 9.0 730 8
    Music 4716 7.0 674 8
    Legal Studies 2678 4.0 670 9
    Marketing 5813 9.0 646 9
    Research and Advanced Studies 3840 6.0 640 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7642 12.0 637 10
    Theatre 3080 5.0 616 10
    Accounting 7867 13.0 606 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18371 32.0 575 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1187 3.0 396 11
    Management Information Systems 1171 3.0 391 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2013/2014
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 14612 6.0 2436 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 20268 13.0 1560 1
    Economics 3915 3.0 1305 1
    Legal Studies 2492 2.0 1246 2
    Biology 16742 13.5 1241 2
    Art 7799 7.0 1115 2
    Philosophy 5327 5.0 1066 3
    Computer Science 13429 13.0 1033 3
    Finance 3897 4.0 975 3
    English and World Languages 16479 17.0 970 4
    Psychology 15464 16.0 967 4
    Anthropology 7458 8.0 933 4
    Environmental Studies 6500 7.0 929 5
    Management 10801 12.0 901 5
    Criminal Justice 7146 8.0 894 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17666 20.0 884 6
    Communication Arts 12284 14.0 878 6
    History 7630 9.0 848 6
    Physics 3306 4.0 827 7
    Chemistry 7333 9.0 815 7
    Marketing 5653 7.0 808 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6419 8.0 803 8
    Government 4383 6.0 731 8
    Social Work 7703 11.0 701 8
    Accounting 7334 11.0 667 9
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 17988 30.0 600 9
    Music 4177 7.0 597 9
    Nursing 6823 11.8 581 10
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 6941 12.0 579 10
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1127 2.0 564 10
    Research and Advanced Studies 3342 6.0 558 11
    Theatre 2711 5.0 543 11
    Management Information Systems 1104 3.0 368 11


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Upper 34.8 37.3 0.0 0.0 35.4 39.5 28.8 0.0 0.0 36.5 42.0 27.9 0.0 0.0 33.8
    Graduate 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 4.6 6.8 0.0 0.0 5.8


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Upper 69.5% 30.5% 0.0% 0.0% 63.9% 36.1% 0.0% 0.0% 37.2% 62.8% 0.0% 0.0%
    Graduate 52.9% 47.1% 0.0% 0.0% 82.6% 17.4% 0.0% 0.0% 34.0% 66.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Total 68.9% 31.1% 0.0% 0.0% 64.8% 35.2% 0.0% 0.0% 37.0% 63.0% 0.0% 0.0%


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Undergraduate 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( 2.3%)
    Graduate 8 (100.0%) 12 (100.0%) 14 ( 87.5%)