To continue to align state university degree programs with the economic development and workforce needs of the state, the Florida Board of Governors has identified several Areas of Programmatic Strategic Emphasis. These targeted degree areas include:

Click here to see a list of UWF degree programs which have been identified as serving these areas of emphasis.

Student credit hours are calculated by multiplying course enrollment by course credit hours. The numbers included in this table represent the student credit hours generated from courses offered by the department in the Fall and Spring semesters. In CICS, this is determined using the DPT1 and/or DPT2 field listed on the course section (see RCSO).

The weighted student credit hour totals displayed in the table are calculated using the following weighting factors:

Lower Divisionx1.0
Upper Divisionx1.2
Graduatex1.6

For more detail on the numbers displayed in this table, see the Academic Affairs Budget Office website. Student credit hour reports are in the Financial Information section under Student Credit Hours Per Semester.

Please note that the table does not include student credit hours generated from student exchange courses (those with a location code of "IE" or "NE") while the student credit hour reports on the website include these hours. For some departments this will cause a small discrepancy between the two sources. You may click on any row in the student credit hour reports on the website to see a complete breakdown of each course included in the total. The location code for each course is displayed in that breakdown.

Faculty FTE History • Physics
Faculty Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Zengjun Chen N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Chandra Prayaga N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Laszlo Ujj N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Christopher Varney N/A* 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Aaron Wade N/A* 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Guoqing Wu N/A* 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Department Total N/A* 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Tenured Faculty Tenure Earning Faculty Non-Tenure Earning Faculty
 
* Line detail is not available for Fall 2009

Departmental growth capacity represents a department's ability to support more students by offering more courses or raising course enrollment. The growth capacity rank identifies the departments with the greatest need of more faculty lines to support its current student credit hour load. This ranking is determined by dividing the department's weighted fall/spring student credit hours by the number of regular line-item instructional faculty in the department at the start of that academic year. These numbers are displayed in the Student Credit Hours table and the # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status table, respectively. Departments with lower rank values have less capacity for growth based on this calculation than those with higher rank values.

The complete growth capacity ranking of all academic departments is available for each year displayed in the table. To see the complete ranking, click on the academic year in the heading of the table.

The instructor types used for the Average Class Size table and the Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type table do not correspond directly to the instructor type listed on the instructor's record on the course offering in CICS (see RIND and/or RCSO). The instructor type listed in CICS is referred to as the reported instructor type and the instructor type used for the tables is referred to as the effective instructor type. The effective instructor type is calculated as follows:

If the reported instructor type is:

The low enrollment courses table displays the number of courses at the undergraduate and graduate level which have enrollment beneath the standard benchmark value for that level. The standard benchmark value is 20 students for undergraduate courses and 15 students for graduate courses. The following rules apply to both the count and the percentage of low enrollment courses:

  Faculty Line Search Request Template -- 2014 - 2015 Faculty Searches Help

Department Name: Physics

Replacement Line Request
  1. Describe how this faculty line will advance UWF's legislative and strategic priorities in the applicable categories:
    • Economic Development/Workforce Demand

      i. The proposed faculty member will be able to teach General Education Physics courses, which are required by all majors in STEM fields.
      ii. Physics Bachelor’s students that go on to work in the private sector in STEM earn a starting salary between $40,000 and $60,000. Physics Bachelor’s students have the lowest unemployment rate out of all of the natural sciences. Approximately 60% of all Physics Bachelor’s students continue on to graduate school. The mid-career median salary for Physics majors is $101,000, which is the highest of all science degrees and ranks above Mechanical Engineering.

    • Florida Board of Governors Areas of Strategic Emphasis      

      i. Physics and Physics/Engineering are both disciplines that are listed as areas of strategic emphasis. This faculty line will support all areas of strategic emphasis as the responsibilities will be focused on designed General Education natural science lecture and lab courses, specifically General and University Physics I and II.
      ii. With the start of the Mechanical Engineering program, the Physics Department will need to drastically increase enrollment in these courses and a qualified lecturer will be necessary to prevent any faculty member from being overloaded with multiple large enrollment courses.

    • Accreditation Requirements

      The Physics Department is currently operating at a high student to faculty ratio. Moreover, the Department has been heavily dependent on adjunct faculty, who taught 64.7% of the student credit hours offered by the Department in the 2013-2014 academic year. This will have a strong negative impact on the SACSCOC accreditation as the number of permanent faculty are taken into account in their review. Furthermore, with the upcoming addition of Mechanical Engineering, the Department will need this hire to handle the large student influx as requested by the Dean’s office. Without this hire, the University can expect that the student to faculty ratio and the number of courses taught by adjuncts to continue to increase. The result would be an increase in the DWF rate and a drop in student 4 year graduation rate, which are both key elements in the SACSCOC and Florida BOG metrics.

      The Department is already moving to a model of large enrollment sections at the lower division level, with enrollment numbering at approximately 160 students per semester in each section of a General Education science course. The student to faculty ratio will drastically increase when this change occurs, which will dramatically increase the DFW rate.

    • Community/Visibility

      i. Part of this faculty member’s duties will be service to the Department, University and Community through outreach activities. He or she will take a leading role in the University Open House, advising, visits to local schools, visits by local schools to the Department, and other community activities, such as science fairs and the Science Olympiad, etc.
      ii. Since the duties for this position are focused on service courses, such as General Education science lectures, this faculty member will teach courses that virtually all STEM majors will take.

  2. Any additional information to further explain the request such as comments on evidence of quality, general education requirements, significant pressure points, Emerald Coast offerings, online courses, etc:

    a. At present, the Physics Department is unable to meet its obligations due to being understaffed. This semester, 2 faculty members are in an overload, and it is expected that at least 1 faculty member will need to be in an overload every semester for the foreseeable future.
    b. Because of the department is understaffed, the department cannot guarantee being able to offer the introductory astronomy course, which is a large enrollment General Education science lecture course that peaked at 90 students per semester and is expected to continue to grow due to community and student body interest. The loss of FTEs will severely impact the Physics Department and lower the University’s bottom line.
    c. Due to the low staffing, the Physics Department will be forced to move to a model where all General Education courses are offered as a single, large-enrollment section. This will have a negative impact on DFW rates, even when high impact teaching practices are utilized. It is expected that this will raise the current DFW rate from about 20-30% to the national average of 40%.
    d. Qualified adjuncts to teach general studies labs and/or lectures is difficult because we do not have local industries that employ physicists with graduate degrees. With the exception of Dr. Wooten (former adjunct Astronomy teacher), adjunct faculty that the Department has used to teach General and University Physics I & II have had high DWF rates and substandard student evaluations. In the absence of qualified adjuncts in the community, the department must look externally or be prepared to utilize senior undergraduate physics majors. This position will attract a highly qualified individual so that the department and university do not have to grossly lower our educational standards.

  3. If this request is for a tenure-earning position, explain why a tenure-earning position is needed:

  4. a. General Description of Workload Assignment:

    A typical semester workload would be two large-enrollment sections of either General or University Physics I or II and two corresponding labs or one large-enrollment section of General or University Physics I or II and three corresponding labs.



    b. Explain how the workload/courses are currently being covered by the department:

    The department is meeting the workload by having half the faculty on overload and through heavy adjunct usage.

  5. Please review the enrollment data for the department shown below. Refer to this data to answer the questions that follow.

    Fall Headcount (# of majors by specialization)
    Specialization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 +/-
    Undergraduate
    19023A: PHYSICS  21   19   29   43   48  ↑ 129%
    19023E: PHYSICS/ENGINEERING  23   30   30   26   28  ↑ 22%
    19023F: PHYSICS/COMPUTATNL  2   2   1   1   0  ↓ ∞
    1902 U: PHYSICS/UG/NON-DEG  4   1   5   7   3  ↓ 25%
    TOTAL 50 52 65 77 79 ↑ 58%
    indicates non-degree major


    Degrees Awarded (by specialization)
    Specialization 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Undergraduate
    19023A: PHYSICS  4   4   0   11   4 
    =
    19023E: PHYSICS/ENGINEERING  2   3   4   2   1  ↓ 50%
    TOTAL 6 7 4 13 5 ↓ 17%


  6. Please explain why any undergraduate degree specializations* with fewer then 15 majors have not been deleted:

    All specializations with fewer than 15 majors have already been deleted.

  7. Please explain why any graduate degree specializations* with fewer then 10 majors have not been deleted:

    The Physics Department does not currently offer any graduate degree specializations.

    * Does not include non-degree specializations (indicated with a † above)

  8. Additional information that will be used to evaluate capacity:

    Student Credit Hours - Fall/Spring
    09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 +/-
    Lower
    2061 2240 2406 2402 2372 ↑ 15.09%
    Upper
    646 736 804 918 778 ↑ 20.43%
    Graduate
    124 0 0 0 0 ↓ ∞
    Total
    2831 2976 3210 3320 3150 ↑ 11.27%
    Weighted Total
    3035 3123 3371 3504 3306 ↑  8.93%


    # of FTE Faculty by Tenure Status
      Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Tenure & Tenure Earning 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0
    Non-Tenure Earning 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0


    Departmental Growth Capacity
      2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
    Weighted SCH/FTE 843 876 827
    Growth Capacity Rank 7 (of 11) 6 (of 11) 7 (of 11)
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2011/2012
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 9024 4.0 2256 1
    Biology 16733 10.5 1594 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 19067 14.0 1362 1
    Art 9133 7.0 1305 2
    Computer Science 12818 11.0 1166 2
    Anthropology 8127 7.0 1162 2
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17036 15.3 1114 3
    History 8724 8.0 1091 3
    Psychology 16253 15.0 1084 3
    English and World Languages 17307 16.0 1082 4
    Philosophy 6006 6.0 1001 4
    Criminal Justice 6951 7.0 993 4
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 4952 5.0 991 5
    Finance 3858 4.0 965 5
    Legal Studies 2771 3.0 924 5
    Communication Arts 12916 14.0 923 6
    Marketing 6387 7.0 913 6
    Environmental Studies 6273 7.0 897 6
    Management 9366 11.0 852 7
    Physics 3371 4.0 843 7
    Chemistry 6730 8.0 842 7
    Research and Advanced Studies 5818 7.0 832 8
    Economics 3291 4.0 823 8
    Social Work 7981 10.0 799 8
    Accounting 7560 10.0 757 9
    Government 3606 5.0 722 9
    Theatre 3523 5.0 705 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7485 11.0 681 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18823 29.0 650 10
    Music 4414 7.0 631 10
    Nursing 4903 9.0 545 11
    Management Information Systems 1461 3.0 487 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1350 3.0 450 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2012/2013
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 11819 6.0 1970 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 22668 15.0 1512 1
    Art 9311 7.0 1331 1
    Biology 17727 13.5 1314 2
    Philosophy 6383 5.0 1277 2
    Economics 3502 3.0 1168 2
    Anthropology 8391 8.0 1049 3
    English and World Languages 17654 17.0 1039 3
    Criminal Justice 7000 7.0 1000 3
    Finance 3958 4.0 990 4
    Computer Science 12644 13.0 973 4
    Psychology 15498 16.0 969 4
    Environmental Studies 6673 7.0 954 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 18081 19.3 937 5
    Communication Arts 12971 14.0 927 5
    History 8177 9.0 909 6
    Physics 3504 4.0 876 6
    Government 4232 5.0 847 6
    Chemistry 7148 9.0 795 7
    Management 9426 12.0 786 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6086 8.0 761 7
    Social Work 7415 10.0 742 8
    Nursing 6563 9.0 730 8
    Music 4716 7.0 674 8
    Legal Studies 2678 4.0 670 9
    Marketing 5813 9.0 646 9
    Research and Advanced Studies 3840 6.0 640 9
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 7642 12.0 637 10
    Theatre 3080 5.0 616 10
    Accounting 7867 13.0 606 10
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 18371 32.0 575 11
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1187 3.0 396 11
    Management Information Systems 1171 3.0 391 11
    Departmental Growth Capacity Ranking: 2013/2014
    Department Weighted
    SCH
    FTE SCH

    FTE
    Rank
    Public Health, Clinical and Health Sciences 14612 6.0 2436 1
    Mathematics and Statistics 20268 13.0 1560 1
    Economics 3915 3.0 1305 1
    Legal Studies 2492 2.0 1246 2
    Biology 16742 13.5 1241 2
    Art 7799 7.0 1115 2
    Philosophy 5327 5.0 1066 3
    Computer Science 13429 13.0 1033 3
    Finance 3897 4.0 975 3
    English and World Languages 16479 17.0 970 4
    Psychology 15464 16.0 967 4
    Anthropology 7458 8.0 933 4
    Environmental Studies 6500 7.0 929 5
    Management 10801 12.0 901 5
    Criminal Justice 7146 8.0 894 5
    Exercise Science and Community Health 17666 20.0 884 6
    Communication Arts 12284 14.0 878 6
    History 7630 9.0 848 6
    Physics 3306 4.0 827 7
    Chemistry 7333 9.0 815 7
    Marketing 5653 7.0 808 7
    Electrical and Computer Engineering 6419 8.0 803 8
    Government 4383 6.0 731 8
    Social Work 7703 11.0 701 8
    Accounting 7334 11.0 667 9
    Teacher Education and Educational Leadership 17988 30.0 600 9
    Music 4177 7.0 597 9
    Nursing 6823 11.8 581 10
    Applied Science, Technology and Administration 6941 12.0 579 10
    Clinical Laboratory Sciences 1127 2.0 564 10
    Research and Advanced Studies 3342 6.0 558 11
    Theatre 2711 5.0 543 11
    Management Information Systems 1104 3.0 368 11


    Average Class Size
      Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
    Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All Reg Adj TA ESC All
    Lower 36.5 30.6 0.0 34.0 33.3 36.8 36.0 0.0 35.0 36.2 38.7 36.0 0.0 0.0 36.9
    Upper 12.5 41.0 0.0 17.0 18.0 15.5 26.0 0.0 0.0 19.0 12.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 16.7
    Graduate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


    Percent of student credit hours taught by instructor type
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC Reg Adj TA ESC
    Lower 56.8% 37.9% 0.0% 5.4% 38.4% 56.3% 0.0% 5.4% 33.5% 66.5% 0.0% 0.0%
    Upper 38.1% 49.0% 0.0% 13.0% 50.2% 49.8% 0.0% 0.0% 40.3% 59.7% 0.0% 0.0%
    Graduate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Total 51.5% 41.0% 0.0% 7.5% 41.9% 54.3% 0.0% 3.8% 35.3% 64.7% 0.0% 0.0%


    # (%) of low enrollment courses
    (undergrad: <20, grad: <15)
      11/12 12/13 13/14
    Undergraduate 13 ( 40.6%) 14 ( 43.8%) 11 ( 36.7%)
    Graduate 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%)